Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 751-765 of 940
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Foreign Investments  We have listened to Canadians, who have said very clearly that they do not want a $21 billion carbon tax that would hurt seniors, students and small business. We are in fact going to look at this bill very carefully and, as always, we will do what is in the best interest of Canada and Canadians.

October 17th, 2012House debate

Gary GoodyearConservative

Ethics  The member across the way is part of a party that funnelled illegal tax subsidized money to the Broadbent Institution which, this week, spoke about the NDP's plan, “Green taxes, such as a carbon tax, and higher taxes on natural resources”. Why will the member not recognize that the people in Labrador, in fact, people right across this country, want a low tax plan for jobs and growth, not high taxes that will put them out of work.

October 17th, 2012House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Ethics  With that said, the NDP engaged in an illegal process to forward tax-subsidized money to the Broadbent Institute. That same institute has revealed that the NDP's carbon tax plan would devastate, not Canada in general, but Newfoundland and its new prosperity in particular. Why will a member for Newfoundland not stand up for the taxpayers and the hard-working people from his province?

October 17th, 2012House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Employment  It is about saving the $25 million a year that was realized in this new system, unlike the NDP, whose choice, if given the opportunity, would be to impose a $21 billion tax hike on Canadians through a carbon tax. This change is about improving the way we do business to ensure the top-notch services Canadians expect. We are committed to setting up a tribunal that replaces the current part-time membership with full-time dedicated experts and resources to hear appeals, and reduces the administrative burden, providing greater consistency for decision-making.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Kellie LeitchConservative

Employment  We want to save Canadians funds, unlike the NDP which would unnecessarily tax Canadians $21 billion for a carbon tax if it were given the opportunity. The social security tribunal will improve the way we do business and ensure good service at the lowest possible cost. The new tribunal will be more accessible, reduce administrative burden and provide greater consistency in decision-making.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Kellie LeitchConservative

Aboriginal Affairs  Our government is working with our partners to create jobs and growth in first nation communities, unlike the NDP who want to impose a $20 billion carbon tax that would actually kill jobs for all Canadians including aboriginal Canadians. Together we are working to build a future in which first nations are self-sufficient and prosperous, making their own decisions, managing their own affairs and making strong contributions to the country as a whole.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Kellie LeitchConservative

Aboriginal Affairs  As the member opposite mentioned, her party's preference would be to elevate taxes, to focus on something that we would really prefer not to focus on. The NDP wants to implement a $21 billion carbon tax, something that would ensure that we cannot create jobs and provide opportunities for these young aboriginal Canadians. We are against that. We are going to be focused on ensuring that aboriginal Canadians can succeed.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Kellie LeitchConservative

Finance committee  Of those 10,000 members, did any one of them indicate to you, implore you, that when you were coming up here to make representation to the finance committee today, you were to ask the government to impose a $21 billion carbon tax? Did any one of them?

October 16th, 2012Committee meeting

Mark AdlerConservative

Finance committee  You have producers and you have industry players. In your opinion, what would be the impact of a carbon tax on the sector? Do you see that as having any positive impact of any type?

October 16th, 2012Committee meeting

Randy HobackConservative

Finance committee  You're shaking your head. I know my farmers would definitely would not like to see a carbon tax. I'm sure you're hearing the same things through the whole sector. Would you not agree?

October 16th, 2012Committee meeting

Randy HobackConservative

Finance committee  Then you don't have a position on a carbon tax?

October 16th, 2012Committee meeting

Randy HobackConservative

Business of Supply  If we want to talk about half-truths and mistruths, the NDP members say they are not planning on bringing forward a carbon tax when their own election platform says they are. If someone wants to stand up here and correct the record, it should be the member opposite, not this government.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Tom LukiwskiConservative

Canada Post  I would like to remind members and Canadians that the opposition party blocked the attempt of the government to get the mail to Canadians. By the way, mail would cost a lot more with a carbon tax.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Steven FletcherConservative

Small Business  Speaker, we consulted widely and changes will be made to reduce red tape, reduce the amount of fraud and increase the amount of finances that are available to our small businesses in Canada so they can grow, hire more people and improve our economy. What we will not do is impose a $21 billion carbon tax that will hurt seniors, hurt students and kill small businesses.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Gary GoodyearConservative

Small Business  However, we are ensuring that businesses have better access to the finances they need to grow their business, hire more Canadians and improve our economy. What they do not want and we will not do is impose a $21 billion carbon tax. That will kill jobs and hurt businesses. Increasing taxes will make it harder for businesses to get a loan.

October 16th, 2012House debate

Gary GoodyearConservative