Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 766-780 of 861
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Mr. Speaker, not a word do we not understand. The fact of the matter is that the leader of the federal New Democratic Party entered into negotiations with the Prime Minister of Canada and said that we want the $4.6 billion corporate tax cut rolled back so we can make investments in the lives of Canadians in a way that will improve their quality of life.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  If the member would stop heckling, I would answer the point. The answer is that we made sure the cuts that we agreed are legitimate economic investments stayed, and that means the cuts for small and medium sized business, not the Stronachs of the world, not the other billionaires in Canada or large corporations.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Mr. Speaker, this is interesting, because the Conservatives do not support either. The fact of the matter is that if we look at what happened in this place and to the finances of the country under Brian Mulroney, they should blush at the memory of it. In terms of child care, we know that the Conservatives do not really want to have a universal child care system across Canada.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Mr. Speaker, I think they just do not care to hear these messages today and one way to kill time is to raise points of order that are not really points of order. The fact of the matter is that the Conservatives were quite prepared to support, in the original Liberal budget, $4.6 billion being spent.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I accept the criticism. I am doing my best. Let me go on to talk about the Conservatives. I want to have fun with them because their arguments are the most ridiculous. The Conservatives have made the argument that it is fiscally imprudent for the NDP better balanced budget to pass.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  And the budget would balance. I thank my colleague for that point. This was the foundation that the leader of the New Democratic Party had when he walked in and began negotiations with the Prime Minister of Canada. I think that is what is driving those members crazy, especially the Conservatives.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to join the debate. If I may, I would like to pick up where the previous speaker left off, although obviously I will go in a different direction, because it takes me straight into most of my points. I find it fascinating that the previous speaker and the Bloc and Conservative members who have spoken, the Conservatives in particular, have focused on this issue that the NDP really had no moral right, and these are my words, to join in this agreement to create a better balanced budget because the Liberals are too corrupt.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

An Act to Authorize the Minister of Finance to Make Certain Payments  Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Some of us are slow learners. I apologize again, Sir. The argument from the Conservatives is that the whole thing is too corrupt in terms of content, process, relationship and Gomery, and therefore under no condition should the NDP have joined in any kind of deal, yet here they are moving an amendment that amends it.

June 16th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  Madam Speaker, I was rather underwhelmed by the speech from the minister. I realize she is new but I did not hear about commitment. The only thing that really mattered was that the government would vote for it, and that is good. It guarantees this will pass. There is something I would like to see.

June 9th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  Madam Speaker, I appreciate the member listening and taking the time to comment. I do not think it is that hard to figure out. I was hoping everybody would vote for the motion, but I was also pointing out that I do not want that to become the only thing the Conservatives are prepared to do, which is to vote for a motherhood motion.

June 9th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  Madam Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to join in today's debate. I will be splitting my time with my colleague from Acadie--Bathurst. Unless I am mishearing things, it sounds like every caucus in the House is going to be supporting the motion, which is both a blessing and a curse.

June 9th, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  Mr. Speaker, I heard the comments from the member for Peterborough. The last part of his comments was something to the effect that he took into account all the variables. I must tell members that the only variable here is that the whip came along and said that the position of the hon. member was going to change when this got to the House.

June 2nd, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  Mr. Speaker, the primary difficulty we have is that we do not agree with the premise that it is generous. Take a look at what has happened since 1990 under Conservative and Liberal governments. In the 1990s we started with 75% of the unemployed receiving EI coverage. That means 75% of people who were unemployed qualified for some kind of EI.

June 2nd, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  Mr. Speaker, I am sorry. I think I am getting better, but I do not have it down just yet. However, I accept that and I will do my best to continue to stop presenting things in a way that is unacceptable to you. However, the anger I suppose is part of it and I appreciate the tenor that you took in slapping me on the wrist.

June 2nd, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Supply  I will scream as loud as I have to get some justice for people who are looking for some kind of recognition that they are important. Damn right I will yell. If the unemployed had a chance to be here it would be deafening. Someone has to stand up and speak for them. It is a good thing that they have friends in the members from Acadie--Bathurst and Windsor West who are prepared to stand up and give voice because you are not prepared to do it.

June 2nd, 2005House debate

David ChristophersonNDP