Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 766-780 of 839
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Iraq  Speaker, over the past few weeks the government's position on Iraq has been unclear and shifting. So to be clear now on the Iraqi threat, does the government now accept reports from security agencies in the United States, the United Kingdom and other countries, including CSIS, that Saddam Hussein represents a significant international security threat, that he has been developing weapons of mass destruction, chemical, biological and nuclear, and that he would be willing to use these against his neighbours?

October 2nd, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Iraq  Some of us here are very skeptical about that but I do not think we can answer all those questions today. I think the task before us is to make absolutely clear that we have some security objectives that must be attained if any of this is to move forward in a positive manner.

October 1st, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Kyoto Protocol  In the case of the Kyoto accord, the Liberal government keeps feeding Canadians unfounded rhetoric. This accord will have devastating consequences for our economy. Canadians deserve a clear explanation. How is the Kyoto accord going to work, and how much will it cost Canadians?

October 1st, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Resumption of debate on Address in Reply  We do not have the chief electoral officer supervising elections and, of course, aboriginal people continue to lack, by and large, property rights and are unable to have things like basic ownership of housing and the accumulation of wealth. The difference between what we offer and what the Liberals stand for is clear and unmistakable: on the one hand, inflated Liberal rhetoric coupled with grandiose big government solutions versus our Canadian Alliance approach, which will be responsible, achievable plans based on practical values to deal with critical priorities.

October 1st, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Code of Conduct  Nothing short of an independent ethics commissioner chosen by parliament, accountable directly to parliament as an officer of parliament, with a clear legislative mandate will do to ensure that this rot does not continue. The continual refusal of the government to allow for such an officer is really incredible. Most modern functioning parliamentary democracies have such an officer.

June 20th, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Cabinet Ministers  Mr. Speaker, it became clear yesterday that the Prime Minister fired his most influential senior cabinet colleague for reasons he is unwilling or unable to explain. He has now assigned his government's two most important functions, finance and national security, to a single minister.

June 4th, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Ethics  Even the Deputy Prime Minister now says that some Canadians were offended by his behaviour during the Shawinigate affair. Having failed to establish in nine years clear ethical standards for his cabinet, for himself and for his government, will he now act and appoint a fully independent ethics commissioner?

May 29th, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Government Contracts  The transaction he should have participated in was paying for that chalet himself right off the bat. It is clear the minister acted inappropriately, whether by incompetence or by design. We should not have been led into believing the stay at the chalet was an upfront commercial transaction when it was not.

May 23rd, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Government Contracts  Mr. Speaker, I will just ignore the sounds of violins for a second. I want to be clear. The minister received a favour from a government contractor. Subsequently, his company received three-quarters of a million dollars in contracts from the minister's department. The minister of public works then tried to convince this House and the public that he had paid the contractor for the service.

May 23rd, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Supply  We have problems with trade, agriculture, the Canadian dollar and the health care system but most of the cabinet is engaging in a self congratulatory rallying around the ethical dilemmas of the government. Let us be clear what about we did not get from the Prime Minister. We did not get any kind of ministerial statement or ethics package. He talked about his plans. What we got is typical. It was not a solid policy or plan to deal with the problem.

May 23rd, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Government Contracts  Speaker, we expect open and honest information here, not to have to make 58,000 access to information requests. Canadians deserve to have the air cleared. One Quebec based advertising executive said that he was told he lost out on government business because his donations to the Liberal Party were not generous enough. Another Ottawa based advertising executive said that he was pressured for donations and free ad work for the Liberal Party.

May 22nd, 2002House debate

Stephen HarperCanadian Alliance

Supply  This is fairly typical of the government and on this particular question it is totally irresponsible. Let me make that absolutely clear. The motion states that the House recognize or adopt as its own the statement by the Prime Minister in 1985: "If we do not win, I will respect the wishes of Quebecers and let them separate".

May 16th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Canada Elections Act  For that I am grateful. It will make it much easier for our party to plan the next election. It is very clear to everybody now that the government has created a situation where, barring some kind of PR catastrophe, it will call an election in early May and will have it in mid-June. That is getting to be a fairly obvious option given what the government has done with this bill.

November 26th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Canadian Volunteer Service Medal For United Nations Peacekeeping Act  Everyone who deals with the military knows that most of the time these people know that there are no clear rules of engagement. Half the time there is not a clear objective. Almost all the time they are grossly under-equipped, grossly undermanned and in great danger. Privately they will tell you about these concerns and they are always bothered by the fact that these concerns are not taken seriously, but they are good soldiers.

November 25th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Quebec Contingency Act (Referendum Conditions)  First, it allows the Government of Canada to determine whether a referendum question in Quebec is clear and unambiguous. If it is not, the Government of Canada is required to undertake a number of actions, including the holding of a parallel referendum in Quebec which asks a clear question on separation from Canada.

October 30th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform