Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 781-795 of 940
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Air Transportation  Speaker, as I understand my colleague, the opposition is asking us to use taxpayer dollars to subsidize air travel. It is rich to hear the New Democrats on this when they want to create a carbon tax of $21 billion. They want to pay for it with that. Here in Canada, we do not use taxpayer money to subsidize this industry. It is a user-pay principle system and we will continue that way.

October 4th, 2012House debate

Denis LebelConservative

Air Transportation  It is rich to hear them say that they want us to lower taxes, when they want to create a $21 billion carbon tax. They want to use that tax money to pay for this.

October 4th, 2012House debate

Denis LebelConservative

Employment Insurance  That is unlike opposition members, such as the New Democrats who want to put in place a carbon tax of $21 billion to kill jobs, or the Liberals who simply vote against every initiative we put forward.

October 4th, 2012House debate

Kellie LeitchConservative

The Environment  This program, which is expected to create some 7,300 jobs across Canada, is yet another example of how we are working toward a cleaner and a healthier environment. Unlike the NDP's $21 billion carbon tax, which would increase the cost of everything, our action plan will create jobs, not kill them.

October 4th, 2012House debate

Peter KentConservative

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, our government will continue to stand up against the NDP's job-killing carbon tax, which will increase the cost of gasoline, groceries and electricity. Our government has been clear that we will never put a tax on carbon. Canadians can continue to count on our government to act in their interests and defend them against the high tax, high spend NDP and its anti-job and anti-growth ideological obsession.

October 3rd, 2012House debate

Joe OliverConservative

Treasury Board  Our services to Canadians, such as OAS and health transfers are up, which is much more useful to balance the budget as counter-opposed to the opposition members who want to have a $21 billion carbon tax. That is not responsible.

October 3rd, 2012House debate

Tony ClementConservative

Financial Institutions  Back to the matter at hand, I find it somewhat ironic that the New Democrats would talk about the credit card companies as those that would fill their coffers with the money of hard-working Canadians with hidden fees and hidden costs. That is exactly what the NDP is trying to do with its massive carbon tax scheme, which is hidden in plain sight in its 2011 election platform. This scheme clearly states that the New Democrats would have a $21 billion cost to taxpayers in the form of higher taxes.

October 2nd, 2012House debate

Shelly GloverConservative

Small and Medium-Sized Businesses  We came up with an action plan with 90 specific recommendations that we are acting upon. What is their response on the other side? A $21 billion carbon tax. How is that going to help small business?

October 2nd, 2012House debate

Tony ClementConservative

Business of Supply  It shows how biased he is, and if there is that much bias, why we would take any advice from that party? Not only that, but this is the party that wants a carbon tax and has economic policies that are very dangerous for this country. We have a very proud record. Apparently the member did not listen to what I was saying. This country is the envy of the world, one of the best in the G8.

October 2nd, 2012House debate

Deepak ObhraiConservative

Business of Supply  Just as a point of clarification, it was the NDP's platform proposal, I believe on page 4, that listed $21 billion of new revenue that the government would generate through a carbon tax. The Leader of the Opposition went further during his debate and—

October 2nd, 2012House debate

Eve AdamsConservative

Business of Supply  Speaker, I find it interesting that the members opposite get up and start making very personal attacks about people as soon as the carbon tax is raised. I think that, clearly, the opposition is quite embarrassed about its $21 billion tax on Canadian families. It is something that would raise the price of everything that people consume.

October 2nd, 2012House debate

Eve AdamsConservative

Business of Supply  That is why we have demonstrated such strong economic growth, job creation and prosperity in Canada. In contrast, the NDP still clearly favours reckless economic policies, such as the carbon tax, that would deter investments, kill jobs, raise the price of gasoline by 10¢ a litre and hurt—

October 2nd, 2012House debate

Eve AdamsConservative

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, the member mentioned the $21 billion carbon tax. That is huge because everybody would pay more money for everything they eat, drink or travel in. Under the previous pilot project, claimants could only earn up to the greater of $75 or 40% of their weekly benefits.

October 1st, 2012House debate

Joy SmithConservative

Business of Supply  While it is clear that this Conservative government's focus is on jobs, growth and long-term prosperity, the NDP and its leader are fixated on a job-killing carbon tax that would raise the price of everything for Canadians, including gasoline that they need to get to work. Sadly, the people most affected by this would be lower income Canadians. This Conservative government has worked hard to reduce taxes for all Canadians.

October 1st, 2012House debate

Stella AmblerConservative

Fisheries and Oceans  Mr. Speaker, the NDP has a plan to impose a carbon tax that would raise the price of everything and hurt the Canadian economy and job growth. The NDP's $21 billion cap-and-tax scheme would punish job creators, raise the price of gasoline and diesel, and essentially tax everything made in Canada.

October 1st, 2012House debate

John WilliamsonConservative