Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 781-795 of 839
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Amendment To The Constitution Of Canada  I reiterate the official position of my party on these two questions, both the democratic consent and the process by which Newfoundland adopted this position and also the general standards of rights and freedoms to denominational education as we know it across the country. In evaluating those two positions the clear majority of the Reform caucus is in support of this amendment and is supported as the official position of the Reform caucus. As this is a sensitive and controversial issue that involves a wide range of conflicting interests, interpretation of specifics and questions of conscience, the Reform leader has made it clear this will be subject to a free vote when it is voted on in Parliament.

May 31st, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Act Respecting Constitutional Amendments  The government says it is not a new formula for constitutional amendment. It is not a constitutional formula because it will not be in the Constitution. That is clear enough, except that it is the stated intention of the government that these proposals will be brought into the Constitution at some point. The government is proposing a new formula for constitutional amendments involving provincial ratification.

November 30th, 1995House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, 1995  Section 52 makes clear that principle is protected. Furthermore, under the Constitution Act of 1982 under section 42(1)(a) the amending formula is explicit that changing the proportion of seats in the House can only be done with a constitutional amendment approved by Parliament and by two-thirds of the provinces representing at least 50 per cent of the population.

April 24th, 1995House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Canada Elections Act  The Reform Party view is of a federal state where both the provinces and the federal government are entities with clear powers in their own jurisdictions. Both have rights to communicate with their citizens directly. I will deal with these amendments randomly because I want the House to understand how radical some of them are.

November 25th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Canada Elections Act  The Reform Party-myself and the leader of the Reform Party-proposed an amendment to that motion which would have made it clear that this particular motion did not give additional powers to the Government of Quebec, did not circumscribe charter rights and did not grant any kind of status to Quebec which would allow it to claim sovereignty under international law.

November 25th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Constitutional Amendments Act  Furthermore, his deputy minister said that particular interpretation could also be challenged in court. She was not clear how the courts would rule if that meaning of provinces, provinces meaning provincial population, was used by the government. She was not sure whether the courts would allow that interpretation or not.

December 11th, 1995House debate

Stephen HarperReform

The Constitution  Despite the referendum loss the Government of Quebec and its future premier have already made it clear that they reject these offers and further that they would reject any offers of renewed federalism. Will the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs make it clear today for all Canadians that the Government of Canada will not make further constitutional offers to a PQ government that has no intention of accepting them and that Canadians are sick and tired of playing this game with the separatists?

November 23rd, 1995House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Canada Elections Act  I hope the committee will look at the reservations of the member for North Vancouver and consider some of the options available. That is all I want to say. I want to make it very clear in this atmosphere of unanimity that there are serious reservations about this bill. I want them on the record.

October 28th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

An Act To Revoke The Conviction Of Louis David Riel  According to MacDowall, Riel said that if the government would consider his personal claims against them and pay him a certain amount in settlement of these claims, he would arrange to make his illiterate and unreasoning followers well satisfied with almost any settlement of their claims for land grants the government might be willing to make. Riel turned to violence only after it became clear that the government would not give him any money. Third, it is often said that taking up arms in the northwest rebellion was the last resort of desperate men. Their peaceful attempts to have their grievances resolved had all been ignored by an uncaring government.

October 21st, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Canadian Bill Of Rights  What I find most surprising in this debate is that it has taken so long for the House to make a clear expression of its support for the protection of property rights. The importance of protecting property rights has long been recognized in Canada and around the world. Property rights are included in the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Canada is a signatory.

September 30th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Referendums  Even as other governments in the world are becoming concerned about the rule of law in Canada, some in Quebec who call themselves federalists have made it clear that they reject any attempt to defend the rule of law in the courts and to defend Canada's right to self-determination. Supporting a unilateral right of the PQ to self-determination is unacceptable to ordinary loyal Canadians across the country.

September 26th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Quebec  I would point out that our position is not new and is not the result of the referendum campaign. Indeed, we made our position on these issues clear a very long time ago. As early as October 1994, after the election of the current separatist government, I raised questions in the House about the legality and constitutionality of the Quebec secession question.

September 26th, 1996House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Quebec Referendum  Is the government now prepared to be clear to Quebecers that this referendum is a yes or a no to separation and that the no side must win for Quebecers to enjoy the benefits of Confederation?

September 26th, 1995House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Supply  It has also been suggested that these are contractual obligations that are somehow sacrosanct. There is no contractual obligation here. Let us be absolutely clear about that. The MP pension plan is a legislative privilege. Section 42 of the Federal Interpretation Act makes it clear that Parliament has the authority to revoke, restrict or modify any privilege or advantage by repealing or amending the statute that granted that privilege.

November 22nd, 1994House debate

Stephen HarperReform

Members Of Parliament Retiringallowances Act  Reform MPs in opting out are not making a political point on a particular day. Let me be very clear to Liberal members about this, those who are thinking of participating. In opting out we are making a solemn pact with the taxpayers. The pact is the following. This pension plan is not reformed satisfactorily.

June 22nd, 1995House debate

Stephen HarperReform