Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 811-825 of 1650
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Privacy  Mr. Speaker, last week the Prime Minister went to extraordinary lengths to defend the Liberals' plan to engage in the unauthorized surveillance of Canadians' personal banking information. We also learned that the Liberals have already seized 15 years of the private information of potentially millions of Canadians from a credit rating bureau.

November 5th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Privacy  Madam Speaker, another day has gone by with the Liberals refusing to actually listen to Canadians. Putting aside the hundreds of pages of privacy breaches by the government, the state does not have the right to monitor law-abiding citizens going about their daily lives, full stop.

November 2nd, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Privacy  Madam Speaker, speaking about privacy, we are talking about millions of records that could potentially impact millions of Canadians, and the Privacy Commissioner is concerned. Speaking about the Privacy Commissioner, yesterday he said that privacy is not a right to be traded off in exchange for innovation.

November 2nd, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 2  Mr. Speaker, of course we are still going through this bill as it has many different divisions. Therefore, if the member cannot answer I would certainly understand. Under division 17 of part 4, basically in order to better communicate Canada's international development efforts, it will be repeal the definition of official development assistance in the Official Development Assistance Accountability Act and confer this power to be done through regulation.

November 1st, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Privacy  Mr. Speaker, the Liberals are refusing to listen to Canadians who are outraged that the government is engaged in unauthorized surveillance of their every financial transaction. Even if the Liberals could guarantee that this data could not fall into the hands of hackers, which they cannot, it would still be an abuse of power to collect it.

November 1st, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Privacy  Mr. Speaker, we are talking about millions of transactions that could potentially affect millions of Canadians. We do not know; it could me, it could you, Mr. Speaker. George Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as a road map. Canadians deserve to be free to live their lives without the state monitoring every single purchase they make.

November 1st, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Privacy  Mr. Speaker, the government has no right to snoop through the personal financial information of Canadians, yet the Liberals are demanding that credit bureaus and banks secretly hand over comprehensive personal information, bank balances, mortgage payments, online purchases, credit card statements, they want it all.

October 30th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Privacy  Mr. Speaker, working with the Privacy Commissioner means heeding concerns about privacy for Canadians, not using his office for political cover. One expert has said that the law has never really contemplated anything on this scale. We are not talking about transactions with possible criminal links.

October 30th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Public Safety  Mr. Speaker, Canadians deserve to feel safe and secure when they use their smart phones. However, the government has refused to ban Communist Chinese government-built technology from our 5G network. The 5G rollout will bring faster speeds, but it will also bring less security unless the government listens to our allies and bans Huawei.

October 25th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Telecommunications  Mr. Speaker, two years ago, the CRTC announced that a 50-megabyte download speed Internet is a basic service all Canadians should have access to. The government claimed it would make that a reality. However, now the details are out, and we can see that the Liberals have failed again.

October 19th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Public Safety  Mr. Speaker, once again the Liberals talk big and then fail to deliver. On giving Communist-China-controlled Huawei access to our mobile network, the public safety minister has said that we will check their equipment, do not worry, but the reality is that equipment will often break down and need to be quickly replaced and may not be perfectly inspected and documented.

October 19th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Trans Mountain Pipeline Project Act  Mr. Speaker, as a fellow British Columbia MP representing a riding that the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion will pass through, citizens and communities have a vested interest in this project. In this place we often talk about the very large numbers, such as a $7.4 billion construction budget.

October 18th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

B.C. Wine Industry  Mr. Speaker, yet another concession the current Liberal government made in the USMCA was to allow U.S. interests to dictate what wine can be sold in British Columbia's grocery stores. For many small family-run wineries, this might see them crowded off the shelves in favour of big, corporate California wineries.

October 3rd, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Multilateral Instrument in Respect of Tax Conventions Act  Mr. Speaker, I am sure if the member of Parliament for Oshawa could say what he really wants, he would probably want to direct that question to the member for Calgary Rocky Ridge because he is that capable of a member. I would simply say results, results, results. Let us bear in mind that this particular multilateral instrument is about the use of highly sophisticated techniques to shift income so that, ultimately, states such as Canada will not receive full taxation, which is all done by Canadian law.

September 28th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative

Multilateral Instrument in Respect of Tax Conventions Act  Mr. Speaker, I would say more generally that this is a multilateral instrument and that this is actually good for developed countries, particularly the OECD countries, which do have a problem of, basically, jurisdiction shopping for the best tax-related policies. Again, there is some shifting of profits to areas that we do not have tax agreements with.

September 28th, 2018House debate

Dan AlbasConservative