Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 811-825 of 861
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canada Border Services Agency Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to join in the debate on Bill C-26. The first thing I would like to do is acknowledge the hard work and tenacity around this issue that both our colleagues from Windsor—Tecumseh and Windsor West have focused on this. It is a huge issue for Windsor.

December 13th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Millennium Partnership Program  Mr. Speaker, without its promised internal audit or program review, there is no evidence that this program met its goals, no evidence that the money was properly spent, and no proof that this was anything more than another Liberal slush fund. The Prime Minister has claimed that he will lead a more transparent and accountable government.

December 13th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Millennium Partnership Program  Mr. Speaker, Canadians have been appalled by the Liberal government's sponsorship fund scandal. Now we are learning about the suspicious handling of the Liberals' millennium fund, including improper documentation and a potentially politicized approvals process. My question is for the Deputy Prime Minister.

December 13th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

First Nations Fiscal and Statistical Management Act  Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with my colleague from Skeena—Bulkley Valley. I am very pleased to rise on behalf of the NDP to speak to Bill C-20. Nothing is perfect, but we see a lot of improvements in this bill over the one that was introduced in the 37th Parliament, Bill C-23.

December 10th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act  Mr. Speaker, this is truly a significant and important day for Hamilton, the Hamilton steelworkers and certainly the retirees who would have been affected by this who did not even have the benefit of a union. This is their day. I am very proud to have seconded the bill. I am proud of the job my colleague from Winnipeg Centre has done on this.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for paying enough attention to want to comment. I did note that he was listening. I might also say it was pure happenstance. Sometimes we just get darn lucky. I was trying to find a younger member of the House and I happened to pick the youngest.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to focus on that. It has been the subject of some serious discussion and debate within our caucus. In fact our colleague from Halifax has sponsored Bill C-236 which is meant to change that very issue and move it from 10 years to two years so students have some opportunity to have a sound footing for a future.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to join in the debate with my own remarks as they relate to Bill C-5. I had an opportunity earlier this morning to raise a few comments in response to the speeches of others. The message, for any members who were here earlier, certainly has not changed.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  In a minority government, my friend from the government benches reminds me. That is another good reason to continue with a fine tradition we have started with the 38th Parliament. In those years the premier of the minority government of Ontario recognized that, with a little pressure, sure enough, but I try to give credit where credit is due.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, the member for Winnipeg Centre is certainly the first one I have heard who has introduced the notion of aboriginal and first nation needs vis-à-vis the education system. Within the last couple of weeks at the public accounts committee, we received the annual report from the Auditor General which indicated that post-secondary education accessibility as it relates to aboriginal and first nations peoples compared to the rest of the population was way out of wack.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Petitions  Mr. Speaker, I have a petition flowing from a demonstration in front of Hamilton City Hall a week ago in support of the citizens of Darfur, who of course are facing unimaginable tragedy. Upwards of 100,000 people have already died. The petition is calling on the Canadian government to play a role in supporting the African Union and the United Nations to do something about this and bring the obscene violence to a halt.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I believe that former Premier Rae has not yet concluded his review and has not made his recommendations. It will be quite interesting to see exactly what comes out of that. The member said that enough money was already being spent but that we were just not spending it wisely.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I listened intently and I appreciate the comments of the member, in particular his closing remarks when he talked, I believe quite forthrightly and from the heart, about his experience in the classroom and what that meant to him and running into the students later. I believe that.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the member's response, except I really do not think it answered the question. If I heard correctly, and please do correct me if I am wrong, he said that there are two components. He has acknowledged that the one component may not benefit the families, which I spoke of earlier in my question.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Canada Education Savings Act  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the comments of the member. He mentioned in his comments that there was not enough participation by lower income students. Yet the whole purpose of this is where families can put disposable income. If they do not have disposable income, then they have nothing to contribute.

December 3rd, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP