Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 8431-8445 of 8577
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Lobbyists Registration Act  It is time we realize that when there are amendments made that will be beneficial to taking corruption out of the system we should support them, not because they are made by the Reform Party or the Bloc, but because they are good for the country.

April 25th, 1995House debate

Jake HoeppnerReform

Pearson International Airport Agreements Act  The public interest becomes lost somewhere between the shuffle of favour after favour and the public interest begins to suffer. This is how political corruption develops. This is exactly how the Conservative Party of Canada has corrupted itself in this Pearson airport deal; a tight circle of friends, bound together no longer by common political purpose but by using their political associations to benefit financially from the public purse.

May 6th, 1994House debate

Chuck StrahlReform

Parliament Of Canada Act  People will support honest, hardworking politicians who are fair, who work to build our country and who raise taxpayers' money fairly and spend it even more fairly and wisely in a very accountable fashion. People will agree that if we are not doing a good job or if we are corrupt or dishonest, we deserve nothing. In fact, nothing is still too much for some in people's minds because of the lack of work they have done or the corruption they have been involved with.

November 22nd, 1995House debate

John SolomonNDP

Pearson Airport  It will be two years since the controversial cancelling of the Pearson airport contract. For two years the government has claimed the process was corrupt and yet for the same two years it has not produced one substantive piece of evidence demonstrating its alleged corruption. For two years the government has claimed it was not a good financial deal for Canadians in spite of government documentation to the contrary, and yet for the same two years it has not come up with an alternative plan.

October 2nd, 1995House debate

Jim GoukReform

Criminal Code  However it would still cover that person. We could call it a gang. We could get the guy who is living off the avails of and corrupting youth. We could charge him under all kinds of jurisdictions. Even if no one in the gang is of legal age, we could still use the legislation for enhanced wiretap accessibility and all the other good things the minister mentioned.

April 21st, 1997House debate

Chuck StrahlReform

Criminal Code  They talked about the different forms in which organized crime is found whether it is in Atlantic Canada, in Ontario, on the prairies or on the west coast. It is remarkable the number of forms in which corruption, intimidation and violence can be found, all in a ruthless effort to squeeze profit out of innocent people and to victimize others. This is not something distinctly associated with one province or one area of the country.

April 21st, 1997House debate

Allan RockLiberal

Criminal Code  We wish to extend the dangerous offender designation to individuals who commit sexual interference crimes, people who obtain sexual services from a child, people who corrupt children, people who commit sexual exploitation of children and sexual acts against children under the age of 18 such as incest, sexual assault and sexual assault with a weapon. How could the government argue with a party that wants to protect children from being subjected to individuals who find it acceptable to rape children and commit sexual assaults on them?

April 15th, 1997House debate

Keith MartinReform

Criminal Code  or has been found guilty of (a.1)-an offence under subsection 160(3) (bestiality in presence of or by child), section 170 (parent or guardian procuring sexual activity), 171 (householder permitting sexual activity by child), or 172 (corrupting children), subsection 212(2) (living of the avails of prostitution by a child) or 212(4) (obtaining sexual services of a child). (a.2) an offence involving a person under the age of eighteen years under section 155 (incest) or 159 (anal intercourse) or subsections 160(1) and (2) bestiality and compelling bestiality).

April 15th, 1997House debate

François LangloisBloc

Criminal Code  Motion No. 3 That Bill C-55, in Clause 4, be amended by replacing lines 17 to 28 on page 6 with the following: "fend if the offender has been convicted of a ) an offence under section 151 (sexual interference), 152 (invitation to sexual touching) or 153 (sexual exploitation), subsection 173(2) (exposure) or section 271 (sexual assault), 272 (sexual assault with a weapon) or 273 (aggravated sexual assault); a .1) an offence under subsection 160(3) (bestiality in presence of or by child), section 170 (parent or guardian procuring sexual activity), 171 (householder permitting sexual activity by child) or 172 (corrupting children), subsection 212(2) (living off the avails of prostitution by a child) or 212(4) (obtaining sexual services of a child); a .2) an offence involving a person under the age of eighteen years under section 155 (incest) or 159 (anal intercourse) or subsections 160(1) and (2) (bestiality and compelling bestiality); a .3) an offence involving a person under the age of eighteen years under section 144 (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female) or 156 (indecent assault on male) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as they read immediately before January 4, 1983; or a .4) has engaged in serious conduct of a sexual nature in the commission of another offence of which the offender has been convicted; and'' Motion No. 4 That Bill C-55, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 12 with the following: "fifteen years from the day on which that person" Mr.

April 15th, 1997House debate

Art HangerReform

Supply  That trust has been lost in the public. All we have to do is open our ears and listen to the fears of people about corruption, suspected corruption or supposed corruption, for the last 30 years. So far no one has accused me of it, but I have seen surveys asking people what is the most popular occupation or who are the most valuable persons in the country.

September 29th, 1994House debate

Myron ThompsonReform

The Budget  Time is running out for Parliament to examine the workings of this department and yet examine it must. Last fall a federal court judge accused the department of a litany of corrupt behaviour which included vote rigging and sham consultative process. This had reference to dealing with the establishment of a halibut quota system on the west coast. The federal court judge noted: "A DFO official's unwillingness to face the obvious meaning of his own words caused the court to doubt the reliability of the evidence offered in defence of the minister's, DFO's, and his own position".

March 21st, 1997House debate

John CumminsReform

Journée Internationale De La Francophonie  It is to our benefit to help maintain international stability, but I have some fear that our financial contributions through CIDA to certain members of la Francophonie represent a disproportionate share of our foreign aid budget. Historically we have helped to prop up some very nasty and corrupt regimes for no apparent reason other than that the recipients speak French. We should perhaps be more careful with our national chequebook. Since 1970, Canada has been a leader in the development of the Francophonie.

March 20th, 1997House debate

Lee MorrisonReform

Firearms Act  We will remind the constituents how the Liberals treated parliamentary democracy in this session, what they did to ram through these government bills and how they abused their power and position. It has been said that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. This goes back to the heart of why we need to change the system. We need to take some of the power away from cabinet and away from the Prime Minister and distribute it among the MPs.

June 12th, 1995House debate

Mike ScottReform

Budget Implementation Act, 1995  Before doing so, I quote the from an article in the Calgary Sun on the weekend entitled ``Tax cheats grow'' about the frustrations of Canadians: COMPAS' survey of 820 adult Canadians last month showed respondents frustrated by corrupt politicians, government waste, overpaid officials and high taxes, in that order. It's a common sense moral view that says if our leaders cheat I'm going to cheat. I want to make it very clear that I am not suggesting for one minute anyone in the House is cheating.

June 6th, 1995House debate

Jim AbbottReform

Budget Implementation Act, 1995  There are checks and balances in the system in Canada. One check against nepotism, bribery and other forms of corruption in government is the competitive process developed in Canada for public service jobs. This means that people get jobs through merit, not because they are someone's friend or they contributed to someone's campaign or happen to know someone in an inner sanctum somewhere.

May 31st, 1995House debate

Chuck StrahlReform