Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 856-861 of 861
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  Mr. Speaker, on the member's opening remark about the $41 billion, if health care is so important and such a crisis and a priority, why was it not done before? Why did the government make the $100 billion in tax cuts before making the investment in health care? That is the wrong priority as far as the NDP is concerned.

October 19th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  A member asks about the $41 billion put back in. If health care is so important and if it needs that kind of money, why was $100 billion put into tax cuts instead of health care? Why was there $100 billion in tax cuts instead of affordable housing? Why was there $100 billion in tax cuts instead of investment in necessary infrastructure, roads and sewers for our cities?

October 19th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Resumption of Debate on Address in Reply  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to join in the debate responding to the Speech from the Throne. I will be sharing my time with the member for Burnaby--Douglas. I want to again thank my constituents for the honour of being here. I want to thank my family for their understanding and support through all of this.

October 19th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

International Interests in Mobile Equipment (aircraft equipment) Act  I would say very directly, Madam Speaker, yes, we do support major investment in our aeronautical and aircraft industry, for the simple reason that if we look around the world, we will see that the most successful aircraft assembly, and quite frankly the only successful aircraft assembly, is in nations where the government is playing a major role.

October 18th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

International Interests in Mobile Equipment (aircraft equipment) Act  Madam Speaker, in response to the hon. member, I think I did mention in my remarks that one of the benefits of the aerospace industry was the value added jobs. It is hard to have highly skilled workers if there is no decent education system in a country. It is harder to have highly skilled workers if they are hungry or sick.

October 18th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

International Interests in Mobile Equipment (aircraft equipment) Act  Madam Speaker, I rise for the first time as the newly elected member for Hamilton Centre. I want to first thank my constituents and say what an incredible honour it is to stand here at this moment and address the House of Commons of our nation. I am joined by colleagues who were in the class of 1990 at Queen's Park in the Ontario legislature, the hon. members for Sault Ste.

October 18th, 2004House debate

David ChristophersonNDP