Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 856-870 of 1177
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canada-Honduras Economic Growth and Prosperity Act  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to be able to ask a question to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, who is maintaining his intellectual dishonesty. I am so sick of hearing members, particularly government members, playing semantics. Yes, we voted against the motion that would have taken powers away from members of Parliament.

June 3rd, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Energy Safety and Security Act  Mr. Speaker, that is an excellent question that I would have liked to address in my speech, but now that I have been asked it, I have the opportunity to talk about it. In fact, we could make clumsy comparisons with certain countries, because not all countries have the same energy resources.

May 29th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Energy Safety and Security Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her question, which is very relevant and echoes somewhat what I was saying at the end. I did not have the time to conclude. Yes, $1 billion is a step in the right direction. However, some governments elsewhere are living up to their responsibilities much more than ours is and making sure that corporations pay the bill for the cleanup.

May 29th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Energy Safety and Security Act  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise on behalf of the people of Sherbrooke to speak to Bill C-22, which some of my colleagues have already discussed today. I will obviously echo what has been said. As I usually do, I will say at the outset that I will be supporting the bill at second reading.

May 29th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Energy Safety and Security Act  Mr. Speaker, I want to come back to what my colleague just said about the liability limit for companies. If there were an unfortunate accident and the damages were much greater than the limit proposed in the bill, who would be liable for the difference? Would the private company be liable for the accident or would the taxpayers be left paying the balance yet again?

May 29th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates on the supplementary estimates (A) 2014-15.

May 28th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Victims Bill of Rights  Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask my colleague a very important question about one of the criticisms directed at this bill. The government says that it wants to give victims more information and let them know about the parole hearings held for people who have committed crimes. The criticism was that this will not change anything about the fact that victims who want the information will be required to register and state explicitly that they want the information.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Victims Bill of Rights  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for the excellent question. I did not have the chance to elaborate on that in my speech. Indeed, the government promised a bill for years and it was highly anticipated. Finally, the experts who analyzed the bill after it was introduced a few months ago said that it would not change much and it was not what was promised.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Victims Bill of Rights  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to answer my colleague's very specific question. She just reaffirmed a point we have been making since I was elected in 2011. The government introduces omnibus bills, including budget implementation bills, and puts all sorts of things in the same basket.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Victims Bill of Rights  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleagues for their warm welcome. I must first point out that I will be sharing my time on Bill C-32, An Act to enact the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights and to amend certain Acts, with the member representing the good citizens of Hull—Aylmer. I would like to mention that we will be supporting the bill at second reading stage because, as we have said a number of times and as we repeat every day, the NDP is a strong advocate for victims' rights.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Victims Bill of Rights Act  Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask a question of my colleague, who seems to be deeply committed to Bill C-32, An Act to enact the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights and to amend certain Acts. I have a number of questions I would like to ask him about the bill, but I will keep it to one brief and specific question.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Extension of Sitting Hours  Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I waited five minutes before doing so. It seems to me that, during that five-minute period, the member was talking about Bill C-24 even though the debate is on Motion No. 10. I would like to know if he will get to the topic at hand, which is Motion No. 10, not Bill C-24.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Support for Crown Corporations  Mr. Speaker, last December, Canada Post, our crown corporation, announced an almost complete restructuring of its operations: higher stamp prices, the loss of 8,000 jobs and, of course, the gradual elimination of door-to-door delivery. Crown corporations belong to Canadians, and Canadians must have their say.

May 27th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Extension of Sitting Hours  Mr. Speaker, I think the Liberals are showing their true colours. They do not really care about the work of Parliament. No one from their party will be speaking to this motion and they do not seem to mind that no one will be speaking on their behalf. What is more, they complain that we spend too much time talking in the House.

May 26th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP

Extension of Sitting Hours  Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for his excellent speech on the government's motion, which is essentially a licence for laziness. The government, which is being just as hypocritical as ever, has introduced a motion and is saying that it is going to work hard and that it is hard-working.

May 26th, 2014House debate

Pierre-Luc DusseaultNDP