Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 9571-9585 of 14180
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Questions Passed as Orders for Returns  Mr. Speaker, if Questions Nos. 354, 355, 356, 358, 359, 363, 365, 367, 369, 371, and 373 could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled immediately.

November 2nd, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Questions Passed as Orders for Returns  Mr. Speaker, I ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand.

November 2nd, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Motions for Papers  Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all notices of motions for the production of papers be allowed to stand.

November 2nd, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Government Response to Petitions  Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 56 petitions.

November 2nd, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fisheries Act  Mr. Speaker, I will start off by complimenting the member for taking the initiative to ensure that we have the debate we are having here this afternoon. I can tell the member that the government's caucus, particularly my colleagues from British Columbia, take this issue very seriously.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fall Economic Statement  Mr. Speaker, it is a very good question, and I would suggest to my friend that there seems to be a difference between the national New Democratic Party and what New Democrats do elsewhere throughout the country. I referred to the NDP government in Manitoba and how it did not seem to have a problem with some role being played by the private sector in infrastructure.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fall Economic Statement  Mr. Speaker, if they were in government for 10 years, they were bound to spend some money on infrastructure. I do appreciate the monies that were spent, but the point is that never before have we seen this type of investment in infrastructure as we have under this particular government.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fall Economic Statement  Mr. Speaker, I actually did listen to the member. One of the things he indicated is that he read from the Liberal platform, which includes a commitment of $125 billion toward infrastructure, I would point out. I thought the member would be standing and applauding the government because not only did we meet that requirement and that promise of $125 billion, but we have actually expanded it to $180 billion-plus over the next 11 years.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fall Economic Statement  Mr. Speaker, I wish I could give the leader of the Green Party a more precise answer. I know there were a lot of people who wanted to ask the Minister of Finance a question after he delivered his speech, but there was limited time. Obviously, we could pass the question on to the Minister of Finance so the member might get a more fulsome answer.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fall Economic Statement  Mr. Speaker, it is important that we recognize that the minister the member is referring to is doing his job, and he is doing a fantastic job. We have airports scattered all over the different regions and all sorts of discussions take place. The minister has a responsibility to listen not just to one individual member of Parliament, but also to the different municipalities and other stakeholders to get a better understanding of all of the different aspects.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fall Economic Statement  Mr. Speaker, like other members of this chamber, I had the good fortune today to listen to the Minister of Finance's announcement, and I believe it is a happy day for Canadians. We should all look at what was presented a little earlier today as a positive thing for all regions in Canada.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 2  Mr. Speaker, a number of Conservatives have talked a great deal about small businesses. This government has listened to the needs of small businesses, and what most small businesses want to see is customers. One of the things we talk about is that the best way to create more customers is to put more disposable income in the pockets of Canadians.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 2  Mr. Speaker, I would like to continue on the topic of infrastructure. In the province of Alberta there have been a number of difficult times. The government has moved in many different ways to try to help Albertans as they go through these difficult times. We are very optimistic, as Albertans have a very strong spirit, that they will not only get out of it but will do well in the future.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 2  Mr. Speaker, my questions are related to the agreements that have been achieved by the provinces and Ottawa. The member and other members have made reference to the CPP. Provincial governments from all regions of the country, working with the strong leadership of this government, have come up with an agreement that will see future retirees receive a better pension.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 2  Mr. Speaker, I wonder if the member believes there is merit in a national government working with the different stakeholders, actually consulting with them on a wide spectrum of issues that would deal with the infrastructure situation we have in Canada. I would cite, for example, NDP governments in the province of Manitoba looking for P3 and coming up with legislation, and looking at ways in which the private sector could be involved in infrastructure.

November 1st, 2016House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal