Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 96226-96240 of 142034
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  While I think it's important to say that we all appreciate that you're open to amendments, there will probably be an intense lobby effort to try to convince parliamentarians that the essence of this bill is wrong, that it's not going to do justice either to passengers or to the industry. While it may be easy to dwell on certain aspects of this, I think it is abundantly clear that the overall thrust of having consumer protection in the airline industry in the 21st century is an absolute must. That is the overriding preoccupation here. Joe Volpe and I were talking about this issue as I was forming my motion just a little over a year ago.

November 2nd, 2009Committee meeting

Gerry ByrneLiberal

Natural Resources committee  Mr. Chair, I'd like to be clear about what we're voting on here. The ruling of the chair is simply to affirm the order of the meeting. In order to change the order of the meeting...I understand it takes unanimous consent to change the agenda.

November 2nd, 2009Committee meeting

David AndersonConservative

Health  Speaker, if the Conservatives would at least show some leadership on H1N1, there would not be such widespread confusion. If they had been clear from the start and assumed their responsibilities, we would not be in such a mess. How could the Conservatives allow the opportunity to be vaccinated in a timely manner to depend on where people live or whether they go to a private clinic?

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Lise ZaracLiberal

Health  The federal government had seven full months to do two primary things: provide the vaccine and send a clear and consistent message to Canadians on H1N1, the plan and the rollout. How is it that the federal government could get it so wrong on both counts?

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Todd RussellLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, let me be clear about the Kyoto protocol and Copenhagen. The objective of the negotiations in Copenhagen is to create a framework to replace the Kyoto protocol. The 192 countries in attendance will all develop national plans once the international framework is in place.

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Jim PrenticeConservative

Health  Speaker, weeks ago when I spoke with public health officials across the country, they said they needed clear information on when the vaccine was coming and how much would come each week. They never received that information which they needed to plan. Now there are huge lineups at vaccination clinics.

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Carolyn BennettLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, the Pembina Institute report is clear: a 25% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions would have little impact on the economy, leaving polluters such as the oil companies in Alberta to pay for pollution. To enable companies to meet such targets, the government must introduce a carbon exchange that the paper companies in Quebec could join.

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Gilles DuceppeBloc

Health  If they are well prepared, why is there clearly not a sufficient supply of vaccines, no coherent information and absolutely no clear leadership on this important issue for Canadians?

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Bob RaeLiberal

Employment Insurance Act  Mr. Speaker, the simple answer to that question is, of course, no. However, it is clear that my colleague from Chambly—Borduas is very knowledgeable about this issue. That is not surprising because he worked in the labour sector for years, and nobody understands the needs of unemployed workers better than he does.

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Nicolas DufourBloc

Employment Insurance Act  The minister herself has said time and time again that these benefits for these industries were supposed to be available for all Canadians, yet now it is very clear that they are not. The forestry industry, for example, is not going to be able to get a buy-in. Could the member rationalize why the minister would say that these benefits would be available to all Canadians when in fact they are not?

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Paul SzaboLiberal

Employment Insurance Act  The Canadian Labour Congress appeared before the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities and made it very clear. The president, Ken Georgetti, very clearly said that he was not happy, but that he still wanted us to vote in favour of the bill. He said that his members across the country are in need, and that is why he does not want us to vote against the bill.

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Yvon GodinNDP

Employment Insurance Act  However, at the end, he asked the committee and all the parties to vote in favour of the bill, because he did not want workers to be denied what little they have been offered. How can the official opposition vote against something, when it is clear that the organization representing the largest number of workers in Canada is asking them to support it? One women said that her EI was running out, and she asked members to pass the bill.

November 2nd, 2009House debate

Yvon GodinNDP

Renewable Energy  The government claims that it is doing enough about renewable energy and feels it does not need to add to that. All colleagues who have spoken about these points have made it very clear how wrong the government is in its assertions. I do not want to repeat many of them, but it is clear that IRENA is welcomed by the very organizations that the government claims will be duplicated and overlapped.

June 11th, 2009House debate

Stéphane DionLiberal

Business of Supply  These very comprehensive principles, which are part of the worldwide effort to fix the global financial system, laid out firm standards with respect to executive compensation practices that require: first, that boards of directors play an active role in the design, operation and evaluation of compensation schemes; second, that compensation be aligned with prudent risk taking and not reward excessive short-term risk taking where risks are realized over long periods; and third, that there be clear, comprehensive and timely public disclosure of information about compensation. We know in this case there certainly has been public disclosure and I believe it is clear and comprehensive.

June 11th, 2009House debate

Dean Del MastroConservative

Business of Supply  The first component of the motion today centres on expanding and increasing the CPP, OAS and GIS to ensure that all Canadians can count on a dignified retirement. It is very clear that many seniors in our country require stronger support measures than are currently offered through these very important programs. We want to ensure that people do not live in poverty in their retirement.

June 11th, 2009House debate

Bill SiksayNDP