Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 10261-10275 of 10284
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Madam Speaker, I would like my colleague to comment a little further with regard to employment insurance and the changes in the budget that the Liberals are supporting. I understand, from what I have read in the budget, that there will be five additional weeks of benefits afforded to people who are entitled to them.

February 12th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Mr. Speaker, I have a question for my hon. colleague from Windsor—Tecumseh. International Women's Day is coming up in March. Yet this budget directly attacks pay equity, while women today already earn only about 71¢ for every dollar earned by a man. What is more, we heard one of our colleagues say today that the NDP is not prepared to stand up for Canadians.

February 12th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question. The women of my riding, and women all over Canada, are not pleased with what has gone on in this House this week and last with respect to pay equity. It will soon be International Women's Day and I believe it will be a sombre celebration this year.

February 11th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Madam Speaker, in my riding, as in other aboriginal communities, there is a lot of poverty and a lack of services. The Conservative government, like the Liberal governments that preceded it, has repeatedly failed to give aboriginal communities the support they deserve. There is a significant shortage of funds, particularly for education.

February 11th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Madam Speaker, it is extremely important we recognize the work that not only our RCMP officers are doing, but also the work of our soldiers are doing in defending our country. It is shameful what the government has done with regard to reneging on collective agreements. It is awful.

February 11th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Madam Speaker, I am honoured to rise in the House today to debate Bill C-10, Budget Implementation Act, 2009. Addressing the House is certainly an honour for me, but I cannot say I am happy do so on this bill. It is especially appalling that the Liberals have decided to support such a flawed bill.

February 11th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2009  Madam Speaker, I would like to point out that in 1996, the maximum employment insurance rate was $604. Now it is approximately $447. Overall, those who can benefit from it receive approximately $355 a week. I would like to ask my colleague if she agrees that one of the best ways to stimulate the economy would be to reduce poverty and ensure that unemployed workers can access EI?

February 11th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Canada–EFTA Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, before I go into the details about EI, I will say that the impact is quite great. Just in the last two months of 2008 over 100,000 people lost their jobs and we have been hearing about job loss after job loss ever since. On the free trade agreement, if we had fair trade, that would be great.

February 4th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Canada–EFTA Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, when we are looking at shipbuilding, it does not just impact those people who are actually building the ships, but it does have a ripple effect into other industries, especially the mining and forestry industries. Everyone would benefit from that, not to mention some of our small business communities and the construction industry as well.

February 4th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Canada–EFTA Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  Madam Speaker, who does actually benefit from free trade? Basically what we have seen is that those at the top of the big industries almost ensure that the smaller entities will have difficulty surviving. There is no such thing as free trade. It just ensures that the biggest players dominate the industry.

February 4th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Canada-EFTA Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  Mr. Speaker, I am glad to join with my colleagues in denouncing this bill which will have long-term implications for the workers of this country. It is a bill which further commits Canada to a free trade agenda when what we should really be pursuing is a fair trade agenda. I find it interesting that we are continuing to negotiate these types of trade deals given the difficulty we have had recently with the rise in protectionism, particularly from the U.S., our biggest trading partner and close signatory in the North American free trade agreement.

February 4th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Canada-EFTA Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act  Mr. Speaker, could the member differentiate between free trade and fair trade? We have seen what happened with the softwood lumber industry and now the impact on our jobs here in Canada. Yesterday, Tembec announced that it would be laying off about 1,500 more workers. We do not disagree that there needs to be a fair trade agreement.

February 4th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Employment Insurance Act  moved for leave to introduce Bill C-280, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (qualification for and entitlement to benefits). Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my hon. colleague from Acadie—Bathurst for seconding the bills I am tabling today. My first bill that I would like to introduce would be to lower the threshold for becoming a major attachment claimant to 360 hours, make special benefits available to those with that level of insurable employment, set the weekly benefit payable to 55% of the average weekly insurable earnings during the highest paid 12 weeks in the 12 month period preceding the interruption of earnings, reduce the qualifying period before receiving benefits, and remove the distinction made in the qualifying period on the basis of the regional unemployment rate.

February 2nd, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Employment Insurance Act  moved for leave to introduce Bill C-281, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (benefit period increase). Mr. Speaker, again, I thank my hon. colleague from Acadie—Bathurst for seconding this bill, which amends the Employment Insurance Act to increase the benefit period for claimants 45 years of age or over who are laid off permanently after 10 years or more in the labour force.

February 2nd, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP

Northern Ontario Communities  Mr. Speaker, communities in northern Ontario have been hard hit by the decline in the mining and forestry industries. However, the budget presented yesterday does not provide significant help for the unemployed, workers and their communities. The money in the economic stimulation plan hinges on equivalent investment from municipalities who do not have these funds.

January 28th, 2009House debate

Carol HughesNDP