Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 104731-104745 of 105744
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Hepatitis C  Speaker, since tens of thousands of Canadians have already been infected, does the minister agree that, by accepting to make arrangements immediately to reach people who may have been infected, she would not only improve their quality of life but also reduce considerably the risk of hepatitis C spreading?

May 30th, 1994House debate

Pierre De SavoyeBloc

Tax Conventions  We also supported arrangements to improve the rules of international trade, like those that were adopted last December at the GATT talks. We also have a tradition of international co-operation and a tradition of reaching out internationally. We remember Lester B. Pearson, whom we admire for his international involvement, and Jean Lesage in Quebec. Therefore, it is not in that regard that the Bloc Quebecois has to show its opposition in the case of international treaties.

May 30th, 1994House debate

Yvan LoubierBloc

Income Tax Act  The task group will provide feedback and advice on this issue to our government colleagues. We have worked out a schedule to reach a cross-section of Canadians, including representatives of custodial and non-custodial parents, child advocates, women's organizations, lawyers, accountants, community groups and others concerned about this issue.

May 30th, 1994House debate

David WalkerLiberal

Social Security Programs  On the member's last point, he wants the cost to fall primarily on those who change their behaviour, but there is no way to distinguish them. If we toughen up the UI rules there is no way to distinguish between persons who take a longer time to look for a job than others would and persons who legitimately cannot find a job because all the factories in their towns have closed. There is no way; the system is not that specific that we can say some persons are not looking hard enough for a job so we are going to toughen up on them.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Gar KnutsonLiberal

Social Security Programs  If we want to bring the country from the brink of bankruptcy we are going to have to impose on some people a reduction in the proportion of replacement of earnings they will obtain. We will have to impose on some people a longer waiting period. The co-insurance deductible will have to go up in all programs. If we look at the green book and reinterpret some of the ideas for savings, in the light of the analytical scheme I have presented, namely how does it limit insurance induced changes in behaviour, we will see that many are directed in this way.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Herb GrubelReform

Social Security Programs  De Bané himself said when he was a minister a few years ago-he is now a senator, unfortunately-that it is an investment. Replanting forests no longer replenished by nature is an investment. There are so many other examples I could give you. We could hire twice as many forestry workers since lumber is now in great demand. They are reluctant to do that.

October 7th, 1994House debate

René CanuelBloc

Social Security Programs  Because, as I have pointed out repeatedly, there are still no general and vocational colleges in my region-there is one in Matane- and no universities-you have to go to Rimouski, Quebec, Laval, Montreal- cuts in postsecondary education will mean that hundreds of students will not be able to further their education. If the costs double or triple, we will no longer be able to afford sending our young people to university. The university in Rimouski is great, except that it does not offer all programs. That is why we have to go to Laval or some other university.

October 7th, 1994House debate

René CanuelBloc

Social Security Programs  If the public is to decide or to give broad support to the hard choices to be made, it must be told the truth about the numbers and the real tradeoffs. The discussion paper is a reflection of the concerns the Liberals can no longer deny or avoid. Will the member return to his riding and outline in cold, hard terms the choices to be made with the dollar value and the direct community result, not just for the few items in the green paper but for the whole social safety net package?

October 7th, 1994House debate

Paul ForsethReform

Social Security Programs  This is a discussion paper for all Canadians. The government has said very clearly that we can no longer simply tinker with social programs. It is necessary for us to make some major changes in the way and the kinds of programs we deliver to Canadians. That is why we have this discussion paper.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Paul SzaboLiberal

Social Security Programs  It happens too often to say simply: "It is just an isolated case". It shows us that the status quo no longer works well enough and is in real danger of losing the support of Canadians. It goes a long way to show why 78 per cent of Canadians believe our social programs are essential but 85 per cent believe they must be reformed.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Paul SzaboLiberal

Questions On The Order Paper  Just last week some questions were reported from me. As you are probably aware, Mr. Speaker, compound questions no longer seem to be permitted. If we have a question that has three or four elements, we have to use up the four spaces in our question quota all at once. Then we sit and fidget for 45 days, hoping that eventually the paper will clear and we can ask more questions.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Vic AlthouseNDP

Social Program Reform  Let me make one important point. These are our proposed three year agreements. There is no point in having longer term agreements until we know what the new structure of our programs will be. There is no point in reassembling or reallocating programs that may not exist or that may be changed or altered.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Lloyd AxworthyLiberal

Social Security Programs  In the past the family has been able to count on government support to help meet the needs of their child, but no longer. Families such as these look to the federal and provincial governments to work together to rationalize programs so they help those most in need. Some of the most worrisome parts of the paper are the suggestions for changes in UI, worrisome because in its two-tier proposal the government was unable to offer a definition of frequent user.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Elsie WayneProgressive Conservative

Social Security Programs  The government spends $110 million a day more than it earns on programs that are antiquated, misguided and that Canadians no longer believe in or support. Given this mindset the government now has an excellent opportunity to begin to overhaul the system and to redirect funds to individuals who need it. The Reform Party believes that the people of Canada are this country's most valuable resource and that the nurture and development of human knowledge, skills and relationships are the keys to full participation in the 21st century.

October 7th, 1994House debate

Jan BrownReform

Social Security Programs  All those who are familiar with public finance management know that the federal government's budget measures are similar to those imposed by the International Monetary Fund on countries that will soon no longer be able to pay off their debts. To get out of the financial abyss it threw itself into, the federal government is trying to pass the buck to the provinces and to individual Canadians while continuing to impose its own programs and priorities.

October 6th, 1994House debate

Benoît TremblayBloc