Environment committee  Ultimately, the 40% target is what each department should shoot for, so again, we've made public how each department has progressed against that target. Again, that's on the website and available. We're asking all departments to hit that target, but you can also look at the distribution, if you will, of the emissions.

Environment committee  Yes.

Environment committee  Sorry to be unclear, if I'm unclear, but each department's target is 40%.

Environment committee  We've seen the profile of the departments. We've been sitting down with the departments to look at an action plan to get there. We've encouraged departments to take a whole-of-department view. They should look at all of their assets, look at their investment plan going forward, and assess where the opportunities are to get to the 40%.

Environment committee  Yes, the government's greenhouse gas emissions.

Environment committee  I just want to clarify the difference. If you're talking about the cabinet directive on strategic environmental assessment, then—

Environment committee  Yes.

Environment committee  The mandate of—

Environment committee  I think as departments go forward with their strategies, there are lots of parts of Treasury Board that are involved in the different areas.

Environment committee  Okay. I'm not sure I'm understanding the question.

Environment committee  —to greening government operations, yes.

Environment committee  Yes.

Environment committee  We can, as it says here, establish policies or directives applicable to the environment.

Environment committee  Yes. We can thus go broader, to water and waste. We can—Treasury Board can....

Environment committee  —to environment. That's what this says here. However, there are—