Public Safety committee  That's correct. In the Criminal Code, we, the government, defined “firearm part” and have added it to several offences—for example, trafficking in firearm parts or smuggling in firearm parts—and in some of the procedural parts of the Criminal Code as well. Sections 117.02, 117.04 and 117.05 are existing search and seizure provisions in the Criminal Code, so it's adding “firearm part” to those provisions to allow for the search and seizure of these parts.

Public Safety committee  The definition of “weapon” is set out in section 2 of the Criminal Code. It includes a firearm or anything that can cause bodily injury, I believe. My colleague might have something to add to that. This is an existing provision in the Criminal Code, and we are adding.... I keep saying “we”.

Public Safety committee  Just to clarify, we're speaking to the section on firearm parts, which has already been passed through earlier motions, and this is a consequential amendment to the motion before us. We can't speculate on any kind of future regulations with respect to what the government may or may not prohibit in terms of firearm parts.

Public Safety committee  In the process of drafting provisions in the Criminal Code—and this is an existing provision, so it's been here for several years—the difference between the French and English drafting in the revision is that sometimes there's paragraphing in the French that's not in the English.

Public Safety committee  I think the issue of unfounded complaints is absolutely valid, as we've seen through the testimony from victims' groups, etc. My understanding of the intent of this amendment is to include the “unfounded” language within the revocation provision, which is far past the time a judge would look at an application, as well as the reliability of the evidence and the applicant, and deem that to be vexatious or unfounded at that time.

Public Safety committee  I can't answer the question whether it's this clause or....

Public Safety committee  The definition of provincial court judge is being repealed from, I believe, section 112, but it's being integrated into the clauses for the red flag regime. It just moves the definition through the clauses. It's not being removed completely; it's being repealed and re-enacted in clauses 4 and 10.

Public Safety committee  I would like to clarify with respect to my earlier testimony—and I apologize to the committee—that it's clauses 4 to 11, which would include both the emergency weapon prohibition order and the emergency limitation on access order. It would be clauses 4 to 11.

Public Safety committee  That's correct. It's clauses 4 to 10. Clause 10 is the emergency weapon limitation order. Clause 4 is the red flag emergency weapon prohibition order, up to clause 9, and then clause 10 is the emergency limitation on access order.

Public Safety committee  That's correct. They are consequential—clauses 5, 6 and 7—to existing provisions, but as a result of the red flag regime.

Public Safety committee  Mr. Chair, I can answer that for the committee. Thank you.

Public Safety committee  I do, and it's for 2023. It's not for 2021, as opposed to the last ones I brought.

Public Safety committee  This amendment would add the two new computer data offences to section 109 of the Criminal Code, which is the mandatory prohibition order. It just adds it to the list of offences in paragraph (b) for which a mandatory order must be made following conviction of one of these offences.

Public Safety committee  It's adding proposed subsections 102.1(1) and 102.1(2). Those are the new computer data offences that have already been moved and carried.

Public Safety committee  That is a related motion. I think we can speak to that. That's coming.