Public Safety committee  It's in reference to the eligibility for grandfathering for CZ and the Swiss Arms firearms.

Public Safety committee  Yes, that's correct.

Public Safety committee  Currently, in the example you used, if the classification of a firearm changed to a more restrictive classification, businesses would be required to have that business condition on their licence to possess those types of firearms. If they do have those conditions on the licence t

Public Safety committee  I believe so, yes.

Public Safety committee  I can't speak to all the legalities of it. Post-June 30, as the legislation is currently written, for a firearms business that would still be in possession of these firearms, the firearms would be deemed to be prohibited. The businesses themselves, if they wish to retain them in

Public Safety committee  The business licence regulations would allow a business, assuming they have a prescribed purpose, to possess prohibited firearms and to have those firearms in their inventory. However, it would not allow them to be eligible to make application under Bill C-71 to have the at-fault

Public Safety committee  There are a number of firearms businesses that have certain conditions on their business licence that allow them to be in possession of prohibited firearms for the purposes of their business, whether or not it is for sale to a prop house or to sell to law enforcement, for that ma

Public Safety committee  I don't think it's a question so much of redundancy, but rather that we're almost talking about two different things.

Public Safety committee  I have really nothing to add at this point, to tell you the truth.

Public Safety committee  Yes, absolutely, unless the revocation is as a consequence of a prohibition order enacted by a judge. However, all decisions are reviewable by reference hearing.

Public Safety committee  There are some where the courts are already making mandatory or non-mandatory prohibition orders. Where those prohibition orders are put in place—be it for a 10-year period or a lifetime—the revocation is automatic by virtue of the court order. It would skip all the necessary rev

Public Safety committee  Yes, they will.

Public Safety committee  When an individual makes the initial application for a firearms licence, their entire criminal record is looked at at that point.

Public Safety committee  Currently, on new applications. As it relates to continuous eligibility, there has been some discussion in this room about the distinctions between the two. Continuous eligibility, in essence, brings things in real time to the attention...so continuous eligibility is not looking

Public Safety committee  If I can correct you, sir. No, you're not run against CPIC. What occurs every day is this. There are approximately 400 offences under the Criminal Code that have what are called UCR codes associated to them. Those 400 offences can generate what's called a “firearms interest to po