Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 106-120 of 597
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

National Security  Mr. Speaker, the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons should speak with his own colleague, the Minister of Public Works and Government Services. Michael Fortier himself admits that if he were part of the opposition, he would ask question about this matter. Consequently, I give the minister another chance to reassure Canadians, this House and his own colleague.

May 12th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Canada Post Corporation Act  Mr. Speaker, the answer is very simple. In 2006, Canada Post generated $7.3 billion.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Canada Post Corporation Act  Yes, that is with a “b”, not an “m”, $7.3 billion, and $320 million net profit. No one should attempt to tell Canadians and the thousands of Canadians who work for the international remailers in Canada that their jobs should be lost because that business generates $50 million.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Canada Post Corporation Act  I will begin with the last question first. I read the letter from the Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada that was addressed to Deborah Bourque, the president of CUPW. In it, our leader makes very clear the Liberal policy. The Liberal parliamentary caucus and the Liberal Party are opposed to privatization and deregulation of Canada Post.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Canada Post Corporation Act  Mr. Speaker, I will answer very quickly. In 2006, Canada Post had revenues of $7.3 billion, with a net profit of $320 million. The remailing industry has been around for more than 20 years. This industry is not what has hurt rural mail delivery. I worked at Canada Post and I was unionized.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Canada Post Corporation Act  Mr. Speaker, I rise in this House today to support Bill C-14, an Act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act, on second reading. This bill recognizes the reality that international remailing companies have been operating in Canada for several decades. Why should we punish these small businesses that play an important role in our economy?

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, despite the role he played in Quebec during the election campaign, the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities is still playing innocent. Some candidates, like the member for Beauport—Limoilou, were forced to accept a transfer to their campaign account—and then transfer out again—some $50,000, but the minister himself transferred only $5,000.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, Elections Canada and the Federal Court have already ruled. They found that these instances were not relevant. An email sent December 19, 2005, confirms that the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities and three organizers carefully chose the ridings in Quebec.

May 6th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities was the prime minister's Quebec lieutenant during the last election. Last week, he feigned ignorance when asked how the ridings were chosen and how the money from the in and out scandal was allocated. The search warrant document has made public certain emails addressed to the minister regarding this scheme.

May 5th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, during the last election, the Conservative head office decided it wanted to spend $800,000 in extra dollars for advertising in Quebec that should have been declared as national expenses, but it decided to hide it as local expenses. A December 19, 2005 email confirms that the Minister of Transport decided which ridings would participate in this in and out scheme.

May 5th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Election Expenses  Mr. Speaker, 10% of the candidates listed in the search warrant have now wisely peeled off and are pointing their fingers at the Prime Minister. In turn, that parliamentary secretary says they are not real Conservatives. This scheme was forced on these candidates so that his party goons could run additional ads to win marginal ridings they barely won in 2004, like Nepean—Carleton.

May 1st, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Election Expenses  Mr. Speaker, every day another former Conservative candidate comes out of the shadows. Louise O'Sullivan, who ran in the riding of Westmount—Ville-Marie, has said that Conservative organizers never approached her, because she would have immediately seen right through the in and out scheme.

May 1st, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister did not answer the question, so I will ask it again. When did the Prime Minister find out about the existence of the Conservative election advertising scheme, and did he approve it?

April 30th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Elections Canada  Mr. Speaker, when did the Prime Minister find out about the existence of the Conservative election advertising scheme? Did he approve it?

April 30th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal

Oral History Project  Mr. Speaker, I recently had the opportunity to meet with a group of black veterans here in Ottawa. They were participating in interviews about their experiences as soldiers as part of the oral history project. The project's goal is to inform Canadians and young people that black people have also served honourably as part of Canada's armed forces.

April 28th, 2008House debate

Marlene JenningsLiberal