Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1231-1245 of 1308
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Foreign Affairs  Mr. Speaker, one might quibble in terms of the proximity of Israel's closest ally but, as I said, our long-standing position has not changed. We do consider settlement expansion to be unhelpful to the peace process.

November 18th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Nuclear Energy  Mr. Speaker, Canada's support for a nuclear cooperation agreement is a turning point in our bilateral relationship that we should celebrate. We are rebuilding a relationship that was badly damaged under the previous Liberal government which petulantly imposed ineffective sanctions.

November 18th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Afghanistan  Mr. Speaker, the allegations are simply not true. There is no evidence.

November 18th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Afghanistan  Mr. Speaker, that is an outrageous question. The previous government did not have any detainee policy. Since our government's 2007 strengthened agreement on the transfer of detainees, the Department of Foreign Affairs has received no complaints regarding the treatment of transferred prisoners.

November 18th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Afghanistan  Mr. Speaker, Canada has expressed its support to Afghanistan in that country's efforts to tackle corruption at all levels. Wide-scale corruption, as we know, hinders economic growth and good governance and engenders distrust between the people and the government. I would remind the House that the Minister of National Defence has spoken eloquently and firmly in cautioning and urging the government of Afghanistan to crack down on corruption.

November 17th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Nuclear Energy  Mr. Speaker, as we all know, India has made substantial non-proliferation and disarmament commitments to achieve the trust of the nuclear suppliers group which were reiterated in a political statement on September 5. India has agreed to remain committed to a voluntary unilateral moratorium on nuclear testing.

November 17th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Nuclear Energy  Mr. Speaker, I would remind the member that India is a responsible democracy that shares with Canada the fundamental values of freedom, democracy, human rights and respect, as well as rule of law. Canada's support for this exception for India marks a turning point in our bilateral relations.

November 17th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Nuclear Energy  Mr. Speaker, I would point out to my hon. colleague that other signatories to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty have already signed agreements with India. They, too, recognize that India is, today, a responsible democracy that shares with all of the democracies of the world our values of freedom and the rule of law.

November 17th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Economic Recovery Act (Stimulus)  moved that the bill be read the third time and passed.

November 6th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Economic Recovery Act (Stimulus)  moved that the bill be concurred in. (Motion agreed to)

November 6th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, Canada continues to be concerned about discharges of Devils Lake water. The outlet should remain closed until the scope of the risk is more fully understood and corresponding effective measures are taken and put in place. As the hon. member knows, the International Joint Commission is leading a multi-year survey of fish pathogens and parasites in Devils Lake and the broader basin to better understand the risks associated with the outlet operations.

October 30th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Foreign Affairs  Mr. Speaker, I am not sure exactly what the question was, but I can assure this House that Canada is back on the international stage and Canadians know that this government brought Canada back.

October 30th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act  Mr. Speaker, I am indeed reassured that both the private member's bill and the government Bill C-35 have a common objective. My colleague is absolutely correct in characterizing the only significant difference as being between the listing of states. This list will be created by the government and it will be created to recognize the 41 terrorist entities, which are now listed pursuant to the Canadian Criminal Code.

October 30th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for raising valid concerns. The short answer is, no. This particular bill is aimed at terrorists and the sponsors of terrorists in the interest of victims and their families. I think that any other legislation would merely distract from the central purpose of this particular law.

October 30th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative

Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act  Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for reasonable commentary and for perfectly reasonable and valid questions. In order to address the matter of listings, we need to remember that there are more than 100 countries with which Canada today does not have extradition agreements.

October 30th, 2009House debate

Peter KentConservative