Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 12616-12630 of 13454
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

The Economy  Yet the Liberal leader would throw Canada's advantage away by recklessly establishing a job-killing business tax, raising the GST and imposing a carbon tax. Simply put, the Liberal leader's tax and spend agenda would hurt families and set Canada back.

April 1st, 2010House debate

Rick NorlockConservative

The Economy  Our government has cut taxes for families, businesses and individuals, yet the Liberal leader would throw Canada's advantage away by recklessly hiking job-killing business taxes, raising the GST and imposing a carbon tax. The Liberal leader's tax and spend agenda will kill jobs, put the brakes on our economic recovery and hurt Canadian families. The Liberal tax and spend agenda is something Canadians just cannot afford.

March 31st, 2010House debate

Phil McColemanConservative

The Economy  Our government's top priority remains jobs and economic growth. This is in contrast to the Liberals, who would raise the GST, impose a carbon tax and recklessly hike job-killing businesses taxes--

March 31st, 2010House debate

Scott ArmstrongConservative

Canadian Council on Learning  Here is the greater threat to learning and education: If the Liberals get their way and bring in corporate tax hikes, their carbon tax, and an increase in the GST, they will kill Canadian jobs so that the students who we will be educating will not have jobs to graduate into.

March 30th, 2010House debate

Diane FinleyConservative

The Economy  Yet the Liberal leader wants to stop the recovery in its tracks by raising the GST, bringing back his carbon tax on everything and hiking job-killing business taxes. All Liberals talk about is what they will tax. Higher taxes and reckless spending do not create jobs and they do not encourage economic growth.

March 30th, 2010House debate

Colin CarrieConservative

Taxation  Speaker, at the Liberal spenders conference this past weekend, all the Liberals did was talk about higher taxes. They talked about a GST hike. They discussed reviving the carbon tax. They now have an official plan to raise job-killing business taxes. Would the Minister of Finance tell the House how raising taxes harms Canada's economy.

March 29th, 2010House debate

David TilsonConservative

The Budget  The official opposition members are going to do that. They are going to raise the GST and they are going to impose a carbon tax on everybody, at a time that we are trying to come out of the great recession. It is just shocking, the insensitivity of the Liberal Party, the tax and spend party, to the needs of Canadians, especially small business people in Canada.

March 29th, 2010House debate

Jim FlahertyConservative

Liberal Party Conference  On Friday, there was a proposal to hike the GST back to 7%. On Saturday, there was a clear call to bring back a job-killing carbon tax on everything. On Sunday, what was the Liberal leader's next big idea? He called for job-killing business tax hikes to pay for big and grandiose Liberal spending programs. The fact is that after being away for 34 years, the Liberal leader has come back to Canada with a reckless plan to raise as many taxes as he can, including the GST.

March 29th, 2010House debate

James BezanConservative

Liberal Party Conference  On Friday, the Liberals called for the GST to be raised. On Saturday, the Liberals rallied once again around their job-killing carbon tax on everything. On Sunday, the Liberal leader announced that he would raise job-killing business taxes to pay for his reckless spending promises. We know the Liberal leader is a self-described tax and spend Liberal, but raising taxes would kill jobs and stop our recovery dead in its tracks.

March 29th, 2010House debate

Andrew SaxtonConservative

Liberal Party Conference  Over three days, they suggested raising the GST to 7%, an idea that the Liberal leader did not reject. They proposed a carbon tax, an idea that the Liberal leader was the first to defend during his failed leadership race. They also suggested increasing business taxes in order to fund their grandiose spending programs.

March 29th, 2010House debate

Jacques GourdeConservative

Canada-Jordan Free Trade Act  I share with the hon. member his concern that allowing the Americans to effectively determine their approach to carbon pricing and then impose it on us is irresponsible from a national sovereignty perspective as Canadians, but it is also very dangerous economically. Part of the consideration the Americans are going through right now is potentially a carbon tax being applied to transportation fuels, cap and trade on utilities. We should be engaged in the discussion with them.

March 29th, 2010House debate

Scott BrisonLiberal

Political Activism  Speaking of views that are out of touch with mainstream Canadians, that member authored the Liberal carbon tax, which was rejected as a radical job-killing initiative by Canadians.

March 25th, 2010House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Political Activism  I wonder if he will berate them with the same vitriol as he blames himself for authoring an out-of-touch, radical, job-killing carbon tax, which led to his party's humiliating defeat in the last election.

March 25th, 2010House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Taxation  Speaker, opposition members have never met a tax they did not like. Given the chance, they would raise the GST and introduce a job-killing carbon tax. Yesterday the NDP introduced a bill to tax MP3s and iPods. Both the Bloc and the Liberals support their coalition partners on this tax on Canadian consumers. Could the Minister of Canadian Heritage tell the House our government's position regarding this new tax on Canadians?

March 17th, 2010House debate

Cathy McLeodConservative

Environment Canada  Speaker, my hon. friend and his colleague seem trapped in arrested development back in 2007-08. These are dated allegations that go back some time. They seem to be back with their carbon tax and these matters from several years ago. I think it is because they do not want to focus on what this government has achieved with the Copenhagen accord. I advised the House yesterday that, in fact, 106 countries had ratified the accord.

March 16th, 2010House debate

Jim PrenticeConservative