Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 121-130 of 130
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  That's right, you do. That seems to have been a factor in that in the past, government parties' redistricting and redrawing of boundaries was done by the government of the day, in effect. Back in the 1940s the government of the day brought in a new system under which five seats w

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Gallagher

Electoral Reform committee  No, it's the latter, because the constitution specifies that the ratio of population to TDs must be the same, as far as is practicable, across the country. It is more or less the same in every constituency, which necessitates redrawing the boundaries after every census.

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Gallagher

Electoral Reform committee  There is, inasmuch as efforts are made to base constituencies on counties, because counties are quite important to people. But it's usually necessary to tinker around at the edges of counties. It always causes upset when people find themselves put in a different county. But by an

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Marsh

Electoral Reform committee  No, not really. In a word, there isn't. That would create a potential unfairness. The parties that were stronger in the cities would kind of lose out because they might not get their fair share of seats in the smaller rural constituencies, whereas the big parties would do better

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Gallagher

Electoral Reform committee  The typical number of votes you need to be elected is somewhere around 8,000 to 10,000, so a constituency would probably have about 60,000 electors, I think. They're actually set on the parameters of population. The constitution says it should be a certain ratio of MPs to populat

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Michael Marsh

Electoral Reform committee  In practice what happens is that very often the MPs more or less compete for constituency work. If they get any hint of a problem, such as a water main burst or inadequate schools in some area, every TD from the constituency wants to get involved and wants to be seen as the perso

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Gallagher

Electoral Reform committee  However, in practice, where a party had two members, let's say, from a constituency, both in the campaigning and in the areas where they win support you would normally see that each candidate would win a lot more support around the area in which they lived than they would in othe

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Marsh

Electoral Reform committee  It would be like putting all the shops on one side of town. There would be a big space for someone to set up a shop on the other side of town.

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Marsh

Electoral Reform committee  Okay, I was almost finished. I was just going to say the very final point, that the drawing of riding boundaries is less contentious with multi-member constituencies because there are simply fewer boundaries to draw, as the Prince Edward Island example shows. Finally, I'll just

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Michael Gallagher

Electoral Reform committee  I understand you have a copy of the PowerPoint already, so I'll go over that, if that makes sense to you, in about 20 minutes. What we've put together here is a general overview of electoral systems and then some materials, specifically, on proportional representation by the sin

July 26th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Michael Gallagher