Fisheries committee  We now have CPC-15.

Fisheries committee  Since CPC-15 has been moved, I have a ruling on this one. It is the belief of the chair that the amendment is inadmissible because it aims to create a compensation process that's not envisioned in the bill and that therefore would require a royal recommendation. This amendment is

Fisheries committee  That would work.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Miller has moved a subamendment to remove the section of the amendment that talks about compensation. We'll vote on the subamendment. (Subamendment negatived [See Minutes of Proceedings]) Since the subamendment did not carry, it is the ruling of the chair that this amendm

Fisheries committee  Mr. Hardie.

Fisheries committee  Ms. May.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Donnelly.

Fisheries committee  Therefore, NDP-12 is also defeated. Now we have NDP-13. If NDP-13 is adopted, so is NDP-14 as they are consequential. Mr. Donnelly.

Fisheries committee  We have NDP-14.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Donnelly.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Winfield.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Arnold.

Fisheries committee  We'll turn to CPC-13. Mr. Arnold.

Fisheries committee  Now we have PV-9. If PV-9 is adopted, NDP-12 becomes moot as they are identical. Also, if PV-9 is defeated, so is NDP-12 as they are identical. Ms. May.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Donnelly.