Innovation, Science and Industry  Will the Prime Minister take personal responsibility for these costs and corruption, or will he just blame others again?

Information & Ethics committee  When the Conservatives go on these witch hunts and say things like “you're corrupt”, call you “disgusting” or say that you're “part of a corrupt government”, what impact does that have on you and your family?

Information & Ethics committee  We have a corrupt minister from a corrupt government.

Information & Ethics committee  Alleged corruption by a corrupt government.

Business of Supply  This is something I do not hear the New Democrats and Liberal MPs talk about enough. We have endless examples of corruption in different government bureaucracies. The latest is the SDTC's green slush fund, which the government has admitted to and is shutting down. The government is abandoning it and trying to run away from its own board members, whom it appointed.

Innovation, Science and Industry  Speaker, after nine years of this Liberal-NDP-Bloc government, which is not worth the cost or the corruption, the Auditor General tells us that Sustainable Development Technology Canada violated its conflict of interest policies 90 times and awarded $359 million to 10 projects that were not eligible.

Innovation, Science and Industry  Speaker, the explosive Auditor General's report proves that the Prime Minister is not worth the cost or corruption. The NDP-Liberal government knew conflict of interest policies were not being followed and did absolutely nothing. With $76 million green-lit by Liberal-appointed directors, never to be seen again, Canadians deserve so much better.

Public Services and Procurement  Speaker, the Auditor General report proves the Prime Minister is not worth the cost or the corruption. The NDP-Liberal government spent $200 million on McKinsey, which is just another example of the Prime Minister favouring his insider friends. The AG stated this showed a flagrant disregard for procurement rules, as the government sole-sourced with no justification, and competitive processes were changed to favour McKinsey.

Public Services and Procurement  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is not worth the cost or corruption. Dominic Barton, the former global head of McKinsey, was hand-picked by the PM to be the Canadian ambassador to China and the chair of the advisory council on economic growth. Therefore, it is no surprise that, after 2016, McKinsey contracting began to go up and up, with few signs of stopping.

Public Services and Procurement  Speaker, the Auditor General's report proves that, after nine years, the Prime Minister is not worth the cost or corruption. In her audit of McKinsey, the AG found that the Liberal government broke the rules, showed clear favouritism and could not demonstrate value for money. The Prime Minister needs to take responsibility.

Public Services and Procurement  Speaker, the Auditor General's report proves once again that the Prime Minister is not worth the cost or the corruption. Now, Liberals love McKinsey; apparently, all is fair in love and government contracting. Most of the $200 million in McKinsey contracts did not follow the rules and, in almost half of cases, it was not clear that the contract was needed.

Innovation, Science and Industry  Mr. Speaker, after nine years, this Prime Minister is not worth the cost or the corruption. We are talking about three scathing reports from the Auditor General, not just one or two, but three. I would like to quote the Auditor General. First, there is “The federal organizations' frequent disregard of policies”.

Information & Ethics committee  Mr. Chair, referring to someone as corrupt is unparliamentary. I would ask that you order it be withdrawn.

Information & Ethics committee  I would ask that you ask Mr. Barrett to withdraw those comments. It is unparliamentary to refer to someone as corrupt.

Ethics  Will he commit to getting Canadians their money back? Will he guarantee Canadians that none of these corrupt executives will get a dollar of severance?