Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1336-1350 of 1392
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Mr. Speaker, we have heard a few tautologies from the government. We have heard that a deal is a deal. The government has invoked that in order to refuse to stand up to Saudi Arabia with respect to its record on human rights and proceed with a contract that would deliver arms to that country.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to note that the reversal of the position by the member for Winnipeg North on this is totally appalling. Many times in the last Parliament, 15 or 20 times, he presented petitions, saying that this was terrible, that we needed to get tough on Air Canada, and that we needed to enforce the act.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Mr. Speaker, I am really heartened to hear a concern from a Conservative member about the carbon footprint of Air Canada's operations. I would agree that when it comes to this, given where the jobs are most likely to go, as with a number of issues when it comes to global trade, assessing the carbon footprint of goods and not simply the cost charged to consumers at the counter is very important, indeed.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Mr. Speaker, that is the question that the government has yet to answer. What is here, really? As he says, we have some nods and we have some winks. This may help out Bombardier, and that would be nice because that seems like a big issue; and it is. It is important to continue to have work at Bombardier.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Mr. Speaker, I will start by saying how disappointed I am at having to rise to speak to this bill. This is not the kind of bill that I expected to have to deal with. If I had been told a year ago that the Liberals would be in government and then base a projection about this kind of bill on what they were saying at the time, I never would have thought that I would be speaking to such a bill.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Instruction to Committee on Bill C-2  Mr. Speaker, tomorrow it will be six months since the new government was elected. The most recent bill introduced was Bill C-14. A handful of the bills that are before Parliament are quite routine. They have to do with the estimates. There are around three of those 14 bills that are straight-up repeals of the previous government's laws.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Madam Speaker, part of the issue around Bill C-10 is really about the nature of a deal and the worth of a deal. In 1989, when Air Canada was privatized, there was a deal made with Canadians that we would continue to enjoy the benefits of having a major aerospace company that was Canadian, which meant doing the work in Canada.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Madam Speaker, I thank the hon. member for joining me in noticing the way the western Canadian aerospace industry has been left out of the discussion. We should be taking a more comprehensive approach and trying to develop an aerospace strategy for the country that involves all of its regions, rather than engaging in these kinds of one-off deals.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Madam Speaker, I detect a contradiction between the Liberal members' two arguments. On the one hand, they say these changes will create more jobs for Canadians because we will have centres of excellence in Winnipeg and Montreal, but they are forgetting that there are no guarantees these jobs will exist from one year to the next.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada Public Participation Act  Madam Speaker, I think it is worth noting, in fairness to the hon. member who just asked a very good question, that there was not an answer to that. It is odd to have the Liberals on the one hand wanting to invoke what is going on with Bombardier and the C Series order in their speeches.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

The Budget  Mr. Speaker, today the government brought forward legislation that has to do with medically assisted dying. One of the things I noticed when it presented the budget was that even though we knew this type of legislation was going to be coming to the House, because there is a court-ordered deadline, there was no money in the budget for palliative care.

April 14th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Air Canada  Mr. Speaker, after years of pretending to be champions for Air Canada workers, the Liberals tabled legislation that gives Air Canada free rein to ship the good-paying jobs of 2,600 workers and their families right out of Canada. The Prime Minister once stood alongside protesting maintenance workers.

April 14th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, to the extent that I believe that once Bill C-4 passes we will have a better certification regime in Canada, it is a happy coincidence that the two bills are moving in tandem through the House of Commons. That means that when RCMP members are ready to organize, if they choose to do so, they will have a better certification regime under which to do it.

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, I certainly acknowledge that RCMP members are going to have more of a say around certain aspects of their employment by virtue of the bill. The thanks goes to the Supreme Court on that, not the new government. To the extent that the bill responds minimally to the Supreme Court decision and tries to protect certain exclusions from bargaining, I would say it is a missed opportunity.

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, I thank the member for the question because it cuts to the essence of what I am trying to get at. Collective bargaining can be an important tool to address persistent issues within an organization or workplace. When the government says it is looking at those issues and will get around to them, that they are separate, I think there is already a mistake in conceiving how we might deal with these issues.

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP