Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1351-1365 of 1897
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 1  The Liberals have raised taxes on high-income earners, which is what they decided to do. However, they said it would benefit middle-class Canadians. It benefits people with incomes between $45,000 and $200,000 the most. It benefits the rich, as they like to call them, the wealthy 1% the most. It does nothing for the majority of households in my riding with incomes of under $45,000 a year, so how is that helping all Canadians?

May 6th, 2016House debate

Mark StrahlConservative

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 1.  As the New Democrats have pointed out time and again, one of the first things the Liberal government came up with was a tax cut that it claimed would help middle-class Canadians. However, the parliamentary budget officer said that Canadians who made $200,000 or more a year stood to benefit the most. Despite the rhetoric, what is true is that the wealthiest Canadians continue to benefit more under the government while everyone else continues to lose out.

May 5th, 2016House debate

Niki AshtonNDP

Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 1.  By contrast, the approach of the Liberals is to take a billion dollars from everyday middle-class Canadians to bailout a company that is controlled by a billionaire family, which paid $32 million in executive compensation in the same year that it was seeking handouts from the government.

May 5th, 2016House debate

Pierre PoilievreConservative

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship  Speaker, as I have implied a couple of times, Canada attaches great importance to our friendship with our second North American partner and to the closer ties that will come from lifting the visa, and to the economic benefits to many middle-class Canadians who will benefit with jobs from the additional tourism. At the same time, we are not unaware of the problems raised by my colleague, the member Markham—Unionville. I can assure him that we are all working assiduously to deal with those problems and to mitigate them.

May 5th, 2016House debate

John McCallumLiberal

International Trade committee  Do you see any negative impacts of the TPP on an average middle-class Canadian?

May 5th, 2016Committee meeting

Sukh DhaliwalLiberal

International Trade committee  We hear that you feel that this would maintain the jobs here in Canada and, of course, it's hard to see how a Canadian business would be disadvantaged in the TPP, but we've had others present here and explain to us how Canadians would be disadvantaged in the TPP. While businesses may be a beneficiary of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, average middle-class Canadians and lower-income Canadians would actually end up having to pay more for pharmaceutical drugs. There would be implications for them. I did read one of your articles, Mr. Sookman, in which you said, “The costs of being left behind could be staggering for Canada in the long term.”

May 5th, 2016Committee meeting

Tracey RamseyNDP

Finance  For 10 years, there was no investment in public transit, in green infrastructure, or in anything to tackle climate change. Canadians elected a government that is ready to invest in the future, in middle-class Canadians so that they have more money in their pockets, and in families. These kinds of investments will create growth, which was neglected in Canada by the previous government for the past 10 years.

May 3rd, 2016House debate

Justin TrudeauLiberal

Finance  Speaker, we are moving forward with a plan that is going to make a real difference for Canadians. It starts by helping middle-class Canadians to have better lives. It started with tax cuts and a move forward with the Canada child benefit that will really improve Canadians' lives. Cheques will be starting this July. Then we are going to move forward with investments that will make a real, long-term difference in the productivity and the strength of our economy so that in the future we will be much better off than we were in the last decade under the last government.

May 2nd, 2016House debate

Bill MorneauLiberal

Finance  This means that we will now take action to grow the economy. That is how we plan to help improve the lives of middle-class Canadians.

May 2nd, 2016House debate

Bill MorneauLiberal

Excise Act, 2001  However, sadly, many of us on this side will be unable to support this bill. The Government of Canada is focused on helping middle-class Canadians have more money in their pockets so they are able to save for retirement and provide for their families. We know the single-best thing we, as a government, can do for Canadian businesses, including our spirits industry, is to create a strong economy with a strong customer base, a strong consumer base, a middle class that feels confident about the present and the future, and is on a secure financial footing.

April 22nd, 2016House debate

Steven MacKinnonLiberal

International Trade committee  I would tend to agree with you. I think the real risk is to quintessential middle-class Canadian jobs. When you're talking about entry-level, low-skilled employment, as we grow as an economy—and every economy as we industrialize—we stop doing the rudimentary things that are entry-level economic activities.

April 21st, 2016Committee meeting

Sudhir Sandhu

International Trade committee  If we're easing the restrictions, it stands to reason that it will be easier than it has been. That's why we're here before you today. There's a real impact on hard-working, middle-class Canadians. We need to protect against that.

April 21st, 2016Committee meeting

Sudhir Sandhu

International Trade committee  Construction has one of the highest multipliers in the economy at about 1.7. Those dollars make a difference. When our middle-class Canadians are working, they can buy homes, they can buy cars, and they can invest in goods and services, exactly as the presenters sitting beside me are offering to them. They can educate their children, and they can even put away a little bit for retirement.

April 21st, 2016Committee meeting

Sudhir Sandhu

Instruction to Committee on Bill C-2  In addition to that, when we run the numbers on this particular tax cut and calculate the average savings that this tax cut would provide to the average so-called middle-class Canadian, it works out to about $540 annually. That is from the numbers that were provided by the government's own finance department. If we take that $540 and divide it by 365 days in a year, that ends up being about $1.25 a day.

April 18th, 2016House debate

Ron LiepertConservative

Health committee  As our economy shifts into an age where old models of employment become increasingly rare, old models of benefits are also disappearing. It's important to understand that many middle-class Canadians either don't have good drug coverage or are at risk of losing their drug coverage in the modern Canadian economy. That's the private drug plans. They're not working well for Canadians.

April 18th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. Danielle Martin