Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 13726-13740 of 14143
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Senate Reform Act  Mr. Speaker, it always amazes me how narrow-minded a New Democrat can be. The vast majority of people in the province of Manitoba see value in the Senate, especially when it comes to representing regional interests. Some New Democrats seem convinced that the only way to deal with the Senate is to abolish it.

December 8th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Senate Reform Act  Mr. Speaker, the member referred to ways to add value to an appointed or an elected Senate to better protect minorities and regional interests. We saw what happened with the Canadian Wheat Board and the disadvantage many westerners felt. A regionally based Senate that had more strength to it, whether appointed or elected, would have protected the interests of western Canada.

December 8th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Senate Reform Act  Mr. Speaker, I will not talk about hypocrisy, but I will pose a question. Just prior to starting the debate, New Democrats gave unanimous support for a motion that came from the Senate dealing with a world issue. I believe they gave unanimous support because they recognized what the Senate had done was of value.

December 8th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Senate Reform Act  Mr. Speaker, I question the member when he says that over 60% of the people want to see the Canadian Senate abolished. I do not buy that. I understand that a majority of Canadians do see value in having a Senate. There is no doubt that many people would argue that there needs to be reform within the Senate but they see some value in it.

December 7th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, I agree with the minister when he said that this bill is about Canadians, but if he actually consulted with Canadians, I believe that he would find that a vast majority, not a slight majority, but a vast majority of Canadians do not want more members of Parliament.

December 7th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, Canadians should be concerned in the sense that this is now becoming standard procedure for the Conservative majority government. It does not respect the importance of debate and has demonstrated that time and time again. The minister says the legislation is really important.

December 7th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Madam Speaker, would my colleague comment on why he thinks it is important that all political parties enter into the debate by providing the numbers that they believe the House of Commons should be at?

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Madam Speaker, the NDP is challenged on this issue in terms of coming forward with a number. I can appreciate why. Its members are trying to suck up to the province of Quebec and the voter. NDP members are underestimating the intelligence of the people of Quebec by making themselves irrelevant to the debate.

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, there are four possible positions on the bill. The first position is to reduce the number of members. We have the current Prime Minister who, a number of years ago, used to advocate that we should reduce the number of members of Parliament. The second position is to keep it the same at 308 members, which is what the Liberal Party of Canada has said.

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, I can assure the member that I have consulted probably just as many Canadians as the current Prime Minister consulted back in the 1990s when he was in favour of reducing the number of seats in the House. I suggest she might want to ask the Prime Minister which Canadians he consulted when he came up with the idea of increasing the House of Commons by 30 seats.

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, it is about political leadership. It is about having the courage to do the right thing. If the member is so concerned about it, then why would he not go to Manitoba, where he says the rancour would be the most significant, and debate with me in the province of Manitoba?

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, I am humoured by the question, but the more important issue is the bill itself, Bill C-20. New Democrats have failed to participate genuinely in the debate on this bill because they have not been able to provide their numbers. All they talk about is wanting more seats, but they are not saying how many.

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, the comments made by the member for Wellington—Halton Hills give the impression that at the very least he would support what the Liberals are proposing, except for the issue of dealing with the political rancour that would be created if we were to adopt the Liberal proposal.

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Fair Representation Act  Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to see that the Conservatives have formed an alliance with the New Democrats in agreeing that it is time that Canadians get something they do not want. Canadians do not want more members of Parliament. However, the Conservatives, with the support of the New Democrats, want more MPs whether Canadians want it or not.

December 6th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I rise on the same point. I find it somewhat surprising that the member from New Brunswick would stand in his place today at ten to six to bring home a point that has been explained at great length. I question it in terms of his motivation for bringing it up. The facts do not change.

December 5th, 2011House debate

Kevin LamoureuxLiberal