Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 140296-140310 of 141523
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Department Of Canadian Heritage Act  Actually, one is concerned with the framework, while the other concentrates on content. The future seems pretty clear-cut. The Minister of Industry will approach culture in a way that promotes the interests of large corporations and users, at the expense of the creators. Since the Minister of Industry will be responsible for programs and policies, this does not leave much room to the Minister of Canadian Heritage, who is to reinforce cultural and social values.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Gilbert FillionBloc

Department Of Canadian Heritage Act  The legislation creates a department which will have responsibilities in the areas of national parks, historic sites, cultural development, amateur sports, multiculturalism and official languages. All those areas have clear links to our identity as Canadians. I will speak today specifically about the official languages responsibilities of the Department of Canadian Heritage, the English and French languages and the people who speak them that have shaped Canada and helped define its identity.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Ronald J. DuhamelLiberal

Taxation  Yet through her rather uncharacteristic silence she has implied that even higher gasoline and carbon taxes are possible; she has implied that. My question is for the Minister of the Environment. So that it is very clear to Canadians, will the Minister of the Environment demonstrate her commitment to improving the productivity, as was stated in the paper yesterday, of Canadian business by rejecting any kind of proposed tax grab in the carbon industry?

October 18th, 1994House debate

Ray SpeakerReform

Government Finances  Speaker, the Prime Minister has been very frank with us, since he just told the House they will do absolutely nothing between now and the budget next February to deal with the disastrous situation his government just disclosed. This is a very serious matter. We have here a clear and flagrant admission of irresponsibility. Mr. Speaker, through you I would like to say to the Prime Minister, and to the government that has often asked us for suggestions on concrete measures that the Bloc has been suggesting concrete measures for some time but the government has refused to listen.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Lucien BouchardBloc

Department Of Canadian Heritage Act  Today, both policy and programs provide a response to major problems connected with racism and racial discrimination and to the problems encountered by immigrants seeking to become a part of Canadian society. I want to make it clear that multiculturalism is everybody's business, not just that of members of ethnic and cultural minorities. We all gain if we are able to give everyone a chance to make his way in society and make a full contribution towards building a stronger country.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Eleni BakopanosLiberal

Department Of Canadian Heritage Act  People of Chinese background who built the railway in this country made a contribution to build this country. The Europeans who cleared the west made a contribution to this country. The Italian Canadians who built the railway as well and were incarcerated during the second world war, many of them built this country. This is not an us and them country.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Maria MinnaLiberal

Department Of Canadian Heritage Act  When these policies were tabled in the House last March it was to considerable acclaim for the many stakeholders involved in these aspects of national heritage. There was a clear demonstration that they had been involved in their development. With regard to the specific concerns raised by the member for Kootenay East I would note that it does appear strange that the Department of Canadian Heritage is involved in the road maintenance business.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Roger GallawayLiberal

Department Of Canadian Heritage Act  The first and second generations living in rude cabins in northern Alberta and Saskatchewan got all the exercise they needed clearing land and working away from home to earn a little hard cash. They prospered, helped to build a nation and preserved their language and culture with no help from anyone. Four years ago I spoke at a Reform Party organizational meeting at a hamlet north of Yorkton, Saskatchewan.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Lee MorrisonReform

Criminal Code  Increasing penalties for crimes-in particular I am thinking of non-violent crimes, property related crimes, regulatory offences and the like-and increasing incarceration penalties for those types of crimes do nothing but increase the financial burden on our citizenry and force the government into the pocket of its citizens in terms of taxation which some people see as another form of criminal activity. I suggest that this bill addresses the financial bottom line in society in a very clear, creative and helpful fashion. It provides alternatives in terms of sentences which are based in the community so that offenders will be recognized as offenders. Offenders will be punished for their crimes and they will be rehabilitated within the community itself rather than being isolated and put into institutions which are phenomenally expensive to support.

October 18th, 1994House debate

Shaughnessy CohenLiberal

Department Of Public Works And Government Services Act  I will try in my short two minutes to respond to the member's addendum to his question. First, the Liberal government's position is pretty clear. We cancelled the deal. Canadians obviously thought we made the right decision because they elected us in majority numbers; in fact 98 out of 99 Ontario seats, for the member's recollection.

October 17th, 1994House debate

Joe FontanaLiberal

Department Of Public Works And Government Services Act  He is asking that consent be refused because he would want the bill to have more teeth. He may have some trouble with these subtleties but, not to worry, it will all become very clear, I think, when you hear what the member of the Bloc Quebecois said, and I quote: This is the Bloc Quebecois's proposal: We ask that a public review board be created under the bill to scrutinize contracts awarded by the Department of Public Works and Government Services and to ensure openness.

October 17th, 1994House debate

Don BoudriaLiberal

Department Of Public Works And Government Services Act  I think hon. members will agree that our government has gone to extraordinary lengths to try to minimize the negative effects of departmental restructuring on the workforce. This is a clear demonstration of our commitment to build a new and stronger relationship with the public service and to demonstrate that we both respect it and value its work. The morale in the federal public service took a rather severe battering during the Tory years in power.

October 17th, 1994House debate

Marlene CatterallLiberal

Department Of Public Works And Government Services Act  This government's commitment to the integrity if the procurement process has been made very clear with the increased use of OBS and the recent release of the new guidelines for public opinion research and advertising contracts. The Minister of Public Works and Government Services has also introduced a new clause aimed at eliminating contingency fees.

October 17th, 1994House debate

Ovid JacksonLiberal

Department Of Natural Resources Act  Madam Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague, the hon. Parliamentary Secretary to Minister of Foreign Affairs. The bill is very clear and we have been saying all along that we recognize and know that natural resources is a provincial jurisdiction. What we should do with Bill C-48 is to reorganize the department. We had two departments and now we have one.

October 17th, 1994House debate

Alfonso GaglianoLiberal

Department Of Natural Resources Act  This is also legitimate for the other provinces. When the Natural Resources Committee, of which I am a member, studied clear cutting, the conclusions it came to were again to centralize authority for the sake of better performance. In opposition, the Bloc Quebecois wanted to show that co-operation would have been more effective because the initiative for reform must not come from the federal government but from the provinces themselves, since as I have said many times, they alone have the mandate to manage their resources.

October 17th, 1994House debate

Bernard DeshaiesBloc