Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 140491-140505 of 141933
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Petitions  Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I am presenting a petition on behalf of British Columbians from all regions of B.C. on anti-firearms legislation. I think the directions are so clear they should be read: "That Justice Minister Allan Rock is proposing anti-firearms legislation that will virtually do nothing to reduce violent crime, but will severely restrict the rights and freedoms of millions of innocent firearms owners, contrary to the very principles of justice".

November 18th, 1994House debate

Daphne JenningsReform

Collège Militaire Royal De Saint-Jean  We have made statements in the House on other occasions, and I think our position is quite clear. I have to say that much of what the hon. member asserts in this particular matter is absolutely false. We are not going to revisit the fact that the budget last year called for a certain reduction in expenditures in defence.

November 18th, 1994House debate

David CollenetteLiberal

Education  I wonder how much time has been allocated to each of the 165 organizations whose noses are still in the public trough as they received almost $4 million in intervening funding. It seems clear to me that the Liberals are following the previous government's actions of talking to whom they wish and then having the audacity to call it public consultations. Canadians are not stupid.

November 18th, 1994House debate

Hugh HanrahanReform

Privilege  I appreciate the hon. member's attempt to tie his argument to this portion of the citation. However, in carefully reading Speaker Jerome's ruling, it is clear that the point he was trying to make, and this is important for us today, was that it is necessary to look at our conduct in this matter. This, I feel, can only be done if specific allegations are raised about the conduct of a specific individual or group of individuals, as the Speaker ruled in 1977.

November 18th, 1994House debate

The Speaker

Access To Information  Because the issue of the Crow benefit is of incredible importance to the farmers and the communities that they support in northwest Saskatchewan as well as across the prairies, I thought it was appropriate to clear the air and let farmers who are now just starting to plan next year's crop know where they stand going into that crop year. Those conflicting reports were numerous. During the month of October when he was touring Asia, the Minister for International Trade said he wanted Canada to eliminate all farm export subsidies including the Crow benefit and indeed prohibit any new ones.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Len TaylorNDP

Social Security Programs  They told me: "Yes, we know this has to happen and your presentation has really made it that much more clear, especially in regard to the aging population and the number of people on pension".

November 17th, 1994House debate

Leon BenoitReform

Social Security Programs  He might have joined the Liberal Party instead and he would be much happier than he is today. The red book made it very clear that the government was committed to reducing the deficit to 3 per cent of gross national product by year three of its mandate. That is the promise the government is going to keep. That is the promise I was discussing earlier in my speech.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Peter MillikenLiberal

Social Security Programs  The minister outlined two basic proposals for change in UI. He is willing to receive others. He has made that very clear. That is what the public debate is about. He said we could have a new unemployment insurance program or we could tighten the rules of the existing UI program further. We have been tightening the rules ever since I got elected in 1988.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Peter MillikenLiberal

Social Security Programs  We have here proof, once again, that federalism does not work. When a government can no longer meet the basic needs of its citizens, it is clear that federalism is not working. The debt is now $550 billion. Our deficit will again be close to $40 billion. What more proof do we need that federalism does not work? So what is the answer?

November 17th, 1994House debate

Nic LeblancBloc

Canada Communication Group  Speaker, the hon. member makes reference to the report which the Treasury Board minister has tabled. Let it be particularly clear there have been breaches if you will of the Financial Administration Act. Treasury Board in co-operation with other ministries has taken corrective action to make certain this does not happen again.

November 17th, 1994House debate

David DingwallLiberal

Human Rights  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has made clear that this is a government commitment and that it will be proceeded with on that basis. I should say, in response to the member's reference to dissent or discussion on the government side, that whatever goes on in the caucus of this party is a private matter for us alone.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Allan RockLiberal

Social Security Programs  I predicted-and I was not the only one-that the people would rise up against this reform whose prime objective is very clear: to meet the finance minister's budget requirements by slashing social programs. Yesterday, it was thousands of angry students, as the minister's dry cleaner can attest to. Tomorrow, it will be all the others who have nothing but whom the government is still going after.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Jean LandryBloc

Social Security Programs  Yes, I certainly hope there will be a lot more. Because at the end of the day when the smoke has cleared, everyone will see that this government will bring in a social security reform package which reflects the concerns of Canadians from coast to coast. Will everybody be happy? I doubt that very much.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Roger SimmonsLiberal

Public Service Staff Relations Act  Since I am rising immediately after him, there is no need for me to argue the unionization issue all over again, except to say that Bill C-58 confirms in no uncertain terms that RCMP employees who may, at one time or another, have contemplated forming a brotherhood or a union can forget it for good. If there was room for interpretation before, it is all very clear now. As you probably know, Mr. Speaker, applications were made by RCMP employees wishing to unionize. Actually, some are still pending, but Bill C-58 clearly puts an end to any attempt to unionize.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Michel BellehumeurBloc

Public Service Staff Relations Act  We can feel that government has the support of another opposition party in this matter. That party has been very clear: the government's approach is not the proper one in this case. Bilingualism should mean two languages in Quebec and only one language in the rest of Canada. That is bilingualism according to the Reform Party.

November 17th, 1994House debate

René LaurinBloc