Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 140596-140610 of 142034
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Access To Information  Because the issue of the Crow benefit is of incredible importance to the farmers and the communities that they support in northwest Saskatchewan as well as across the prairies, I thought it was appropriate to clear the air and let farmers who are now just starting to plan next year's crop know where they stand going into that crop year. Those conflicting reports were numerous. During the month of October when he was touring Asia, the Minister for International Trade said he wanted Canada to eliminate all farm export subsidies including the Crow benefit and indeed prohibit any new ones.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Len TaylorNDP

Social Security Programs  They told me: "Yes, we know this has to happen and your presentation has really made it that much more clear, especially in regard to the aging population and the number of people on pension".

November 17th, 1994House debate

Leon BenoitReform

Social Security Programs  He might have joined the Liberal Party instead and he would be much happier than he is today. The red book made it very clear that the government was committed to reducing the deficit to 3 per cent of gross national product by year three of its mandate. That is the promise the government is going to keep. That is the promise I was discussing earlier in my speech.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Peter MillikenLiberal

Social Security Programs  The minister outlined two basic proposals for change in UI. He is willing to receive others. He has made that very clear. That is what the public debate is about. He said we could have a new unemployment insurance program or we could tighten the rules of the existing UI program further. We have been tightening the rules ever since I got elected in 1988.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Peter MillikenLiberal

Social Security Programs  We have here proof, once again, that federalism does not work. When a government can no longer meet the basic needs of its citizens, it is clear that federalism is not working. The debt is now $550 billion. Our deficit will again be close to $40 billion. What more proof do we need that federalism does not work? So what is the answer?

November 17th, 1994House debate

Nic LeblancBloc

Canada Communication Group  Speaker, the hon. member makes reference to the report which the Treasury Board minister has tabled. Let it be particularly clear there have been breaches if you will of the Financial Administration Act. Treasury Board in co-operation with other ministries has taken corrective action to make certain this does not happen again.

November 17th, 1994House debate

David DingwallLiberal

Human Rights  Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has made clear that this is a government commitment and that it will be proceeded with on that basis. I should say, in response to the member's reference to dissent or discussion on the government side, that whatever goes on in the caucus of this party is a private matter for us alone.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Allan RockLiberal

Social Security Programs  I predicted-and I was not the only one-that the people would rise up against this reform whose prime objective is very clear: to meet the finance minister's budget requirements by slashing social programs. Yesterday, it was thousands of angry students, as the minister's dry cleaner can attest to. Tomorrow, it will be all the others who have nothing but whom the government is still going after.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Jean LandryBloc

Social Security Programs  Yes, I certainly hope there will be a lot more. Because at the end of the day when the smoke has cleared, everyone will see that this government will bring in a social security reform package which reflects the concerns of Canadians from coast to coast. Will everybody be happy? I doubt that very much.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Roger SimmonsLiberal

Public Service Staff Relations Act  Since I am rising immediately after him, there is no need for me to argue the unionization issue all over again, except to say that Bill C-58 confirms in no uncertain terms that RCMP employees who may, at one time or another, have contemplated forming a brotherhood or a union can forget it for good. If there was room for interpretation before, it is all very clear now. As you probably know, Mr. Speaker, applications were made by RCMP employees wishing to unionize. Actually, some are still pending, but Bill C-58 clearly puts an end to any attempt to unionize.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Michel BellehumeurBloc

Public Service Staff Relations Act  We can feel that government has the support of another opposition party in this matter. That party has been very clear: the government's approach is not the proper one in this case. Bilingualism should mean two languages in Quebec and only one language in the rest of Canada. That is bilingualism according to the Reform Party.

November 17th, 1994House debate

René LaurinBloc

Public Service Staff Relations Act  There may be other reasons for treating them separately from the police officers within the RCMP, but it is clear the force will have to continue paying the bilingual bonus to these employees. Current management seems to have forgotten the words of former Commissioner Simmonds who stated that payment of such a bonus would have a divisive effect on employees.

November 17th, 1994House debate

Val MeredithReform

Citizenship Act  Nonetheless, the committee provided recommendations designed to prevent the possibility for abuse. We should all be very clear in this respect. The committee did by no means imply that a problem of any significance existed when it provided suggestions on how we might prevent the possibility of abuse. As such I caution members across the way that it is terribly irresponsible to initiate unwarranted anxieties based upon unsubstantiated claims.

November 16th, 1994House debate

Stan DromiskyLiberal

Citizenship Act  Right now the key to reinforcing this integrity lies not in the introduction of an individual specific legislation, it rests in the development of a broad citizenship strategy. We must have a clear sense of the direction we wish to take before we can even begin discussing the specifics. We must develop a plan which reflects the will of the people. It must also encourage those seeking Canadian citizenship to obtain a knowledge of and commitment to this country.

November 16th, 1994House debate

Beryl GaffneyLiberal

Citizenship Act  Why should those who are born here, regardless of their parents' status or their intention to stay in the country, be deemed Canadian? As I have examined the issue it has become increasingly clear to me that there are very real consequences that relate to the very rights and privileges of citizenship we as Canadians hold dear. Citizenship should come not only with a list of rights.

November 16th, 1994House debate

Sharon HayesReform