Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 14626-14640 of 15166
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  Up until the opposition to a carbon tax it sounded like you had a vision.

February 4th, 2008Committee meeting

Dale Marshall

Environment committee  That's the approach that we would advocate, that you set the targets, you put in place a carbon price, whether it's a carbon tax or a cap and trade system--actually, there are hybrids that probably would work best--but at the end of the day, I don't see any reason why it should be the public that picks up the tab for oil and gas companies taking responsibility for the pollution they produce.

February 4th, 2008Committee meeting

Dale Marshall

Environment committee  The research that was done was used by the current government and by the previous Liberal government. The modelling used fixes a carbon price. It does not call for setting a carbon tax, ceiling or exchange system, but for rolling everything into a shadow price. The model verifies changes to energy use patterns. Only by setting a carbon price will we be able to achieve the 80% or better target by 2020.

February 4th, 2008Committee meeting

Dale Marshall

Industry committee  There are a couple of things, Mr. Brison. There is, of course, the issue of what's being called a carbon tax and the impact that might have. I've talked already about the margins and perhaps the inability of our industry to pass additional taxes and charges along to our customers in this era.

January 31st, 2008Committee meeting

Graham Cooper

Industry committee  There has been an emergence over the last year in particular--with the Canadian Council of Chief Executive Officers, the council of sustainable environment, the World Economic Forum, and others--of a growing global consensus that there's going to be a price put on carbon through cap and trade, through carbon taxes in some cases, and in other cases through carbon tariffs. There are even discussions now that France and California are moving toward a carbon tariff regime so that imported goods will be hit with a carbon tariff.

January 31st, 2008Committee meeting

Scott BrisonLiberal

Industry committee  First, when considering policies with respect to the environment and whatever measures the government policy-makers take with respect to the environment, be they emissions trading or carbon taxes, you have to take a look at the fact that transportation is a derived demand. So as to your question about what would be the impact on our industry, it's not so much about what would be the impact on our industry but what would be the impact on the Canadian economy from the perspective of us being an input into the process of trade, of people travelling, of tourism, and the other sectors.

January 31st, 2008Committee meeting

Sam Barone

Industry committee  I think it would be, if I might use the term, more palatable to the industry if it felt that 4¢ was doing something worthwhile. As we move into an era of discussion of carbon taxes and those sorts of things--environmental charges and the like--perhaps that 4¢ might be used for those sorts of things, as opposed to general revenue.

January 31st, 2008Committee meeting

Graham Cooper

Environment committee  In fact, one of the things they talked about was an environmental tax, which is a euphemism, of course, for a carbon tax. At Bali, too, 100 of the world's biggest companies called on governments to take action. I think business is looking for the rules of the game to be made. I'm hoping we'll let bygones be bygones and move on.

January 30th, 2008Committee meeting

Dr. Andrew Weaver

Environment committee  I'm not an economist. I have read a lot, but I'm loath to give testimony on a carbon tax level required to meet the bill because that would be out of my area of expertise, although I'm quite familiar with the method and tools available to the government.

January 30th, 2008Committee meeting

Dr. Andrew Weaver

Environment committee  And I support the carbon tax wholeheartedly.

January 30th, 2008Committee meeting

Dr. Andrew Weaver

Environment committee  But we have to either determine to get there or we have to implement policy measures that force us to get there, such as those the national round table recommends—things such as a carbon tax, which will simply make the production of energy-using fossil fuels too darned expensive. People will naturally find cheaper ways of doing it, and hence emissions from fossil fuel burning will decline.

January 30th, 2008Committee meeting

Ian Rutherford

Civil Marriage Act  We have heard here today some concern from opposition members that marriage has not changed, that this is too dramatic a change. We all recall that not that many years ago blacks and whites did not marry, and Anglicans and Catholics did not marry. Marriage is an evolving process. One of the concerns that people brought forward to the committee and other places was that Bill C-38 might lead to things such as polygamy.

June 28th, 2005House debate

Michael John SavageLiberal

Civil Marriage Act  After several meetings with these religious groups and individuals, we presented an amendment, the only one to be adopted yesterday at report stage. It is an amendment that states in black and white that no religious group will lose its status as a charitable organization for refusing to celebrate marriages between same sex couples. One of these Christian groups made a suggestion for an amendment, which we presented and which was passed yesterday.

June 28th, 2005House debate

Richard MarceauBloc

Civil Marriage Act  It has allowed me to work on files like saving the life of Canadians like William Sampson. This is not a black and white issue. There are some who would like to make it that way. I am not one and I will stand firmly for what is right. I will always wear those things on the sleeve as I walk in the House of Commons.

June 27th, 2005House debate

Dan McTeagueLiberal

Civil Marriage Act  I do not think that the amendment I introduced this afternoon is necessary. However, including this amendment in Bill C-38, and stating in black and white that no church or religious group will lose its status as a charitable organization, allays the fears of the many groups that came to committee to share their concerns. They were not afraid of marrying same sex partners.

June 27th, 2005House debate

Richard MarceauBloc