Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Agriculture committee Mr. Chair, I'd like to make it clear that in no way am I questioning the ethics of the producers or the processors, nor their responsibility. I know they take that responsibility very seriously, and of course it does make good business sense that they do so. In fact, I'd like
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Frank ValerioteLiberal
Subcommittee on Neurological Disease committee for coming. I'm going to suspend for one minute so that we can clear the room and go into our committee business, or allow you to move back. Thank you.
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
The ChairConservative
Government Operations committee to get a clear understanding of one thing. You went to a fundraiser attended by Mr. Paradis. Did the idea that it was important to be there to discuss the problems that you had experienced with regard to the contract come from you, or did someone tell you to go so that you would have
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Diane BourgeoisBloc
Agriculture committee Mr. Chair, I just want to make clear that it was Mr. Richards who proposed the amendment. I'm looking at the original motion, and I see where your amendment would come in. I have here that with your amendment, everything after “and amend” in the initial motion would be gone
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
The Clerk
Agriculture committee It's such a complicated motion. You were right, Chair, that either you study it or you don't study it. It's clear. The way it's amended, whoever studies it, the committee or the government, it's another study; it takes time. Then there will be recommendations, and in a year
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Agriculture committee I think “take action” is pretty clear.
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Blake RichardsConservative
Agriculture committee Just to respond to that, all I've done is to take the suggestion you made, Frank, that we have the government study, and then at the end I've added “and take the necessary action”. So I've made very clear in there that the government will take a look at what needs to be done
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Blake RichardsConservative
Agriculture committee Sure. I already read the amendment asking for a study. Is everybody clear on it? Does anybody want me to read it again?
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
The Vice-Chair Liberal
Agriculture committee Mr. Richards, so I'm clear, Mr. Valeriote doesn't have an amendment--
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
The Vice-Chair Liberal
Agriculture committee to the necessary legislation. It's clear, I support the motion, but if you wanted to add the words, “that the government consult all stakeholders and conduct a study and amend the necessary legislation”, I would be content with that. Failing that, I have no intent of our doing a study. We've
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Frank ValerioteLiberal
Government Operations committee senior public servants do? I don't see anywhere, in any law, where those lines are very clear. It's a wide open situation in terms of being involved and then denying that the involvement was improper or that this amounts to something the minister is responsible for if the staff did
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Duff Conacher
Agriculture committee that actually undermines the credibility of the motion. If you're not going to look into the facts, then the motion is a half-baked motion. So, again, Mr. Chair, and I want to be very clear on this, we support the intent of the motion; it's the wording of the motion. To be fair
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Pierre LemieuxConservative
Agriculture committee content to have that amendment, but I think that having the review serves two purposes: one, it will allow us to make recommendations to the minister; and two, it sends a clear message to the railway industry that they're in our sights, they're on our radar, and that unfair treatment
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Frank ValerioteLiberal
Agriculture committee with CN and CP, but on these issues, we can't just take them and say okay.... Otherwise, we might as well vote on all of this stuff, and we can clear our whole schedule up. If we already know all the answers to everything, we don't need to listen to the farmers' point of view
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Brian StorsethConservative
Government Operations committee Well, that's absolutely consistent with what we've heard from the department. The assistant deputy minister has made it absolutely clear that any decision as it relates to the contracting of the work on West Block was undertaken within the department and was undertaken at his
November 16th, 2010Committee meeting
Chris WarkentinConservative