Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Supply to be heard, I would ask the member why he did not read his House of Commons order book? That order and the description of the consultation process has been on the books for nine months. It is clear to everyone who is a concerned parliamentarian how the process is going to work. I can
October 25th, 1994House debate
David WalkerLiberal
Supply it is going to interact with private industry to ensure that we get back together on our fiscal senses. Nothing has been produced. The government has lost a clear sense of economic leadership in a vision of what the role must be in a modern economy and where it should leave the action
October 25th, 1994House debate
John WilliamsReform
Social Security Program in the 1995 Budget. Mr. Speaker, they could not be more explicit. The federal government's main objectives are clear: the first is literally to cut social programs and the second is to take control over areas of provincial jurisdiction, by maintaining a unilateral decision. From reading
October 24th, 1994House debate
Jean H. LerouxBloc
Social Security Program need to balance the budget during the term of this Parliament. That is what we call tough love for our country. What used to be a clear governing philosophy of incrementalism has even changed of late. Andrew Coyne of the Globe and Mail says of this government's proposals: ``Behind
October 24th, 1994House debate
Chuck StrahlReform
Social Security Program to school and re-train. Our reforms should, and I hope will, address the special needs of those Canadians living in rural areas so they too can benefit from the increased opportunities which will hopefully result from these reforms. It is clear that reforms are badly needed
October 24th, 1994House debate
Ben SerréLiberal
Social Security Program to be careful when we criticize the process if we are not willing to understand the history of the party that teaches how to reform social programs. When I look back on the great history of the Liberal Party it is very clear that the Liberal Party tried very much to ensure that the country
October 24th, 1994House debate
Ron MacDonaldLiberal
Social Security Program , Canadians must adapt to an economy which requires fewer workers. Consequently, the Canadian government must provide its people with a different support system for all those who want to enter or re-enter a highly competitive job market. It is clear to all Canadians that the necessity
October 24th, 1994House debate
Marlene CatterallLiberal
Social Security Program " by the National Council of Welfare concluded that the link between motherhood and poverty was clear. According to that report the only safeguard which stands between most married women and poverty is their husbands' incomes. That is not very reassuring. In fact, the group which is likely
October 24th, 1994House debate
Sheila FinestoneLiberal
Ultramar Canada it is refusing to negotiate seriously with a potential purchaser who could keep the plant open and maintain competition as well as nearly 150 jobs. Since it is clear by the time the bureau may get to rule that this plant may be nothing but a pile of scrap metal, is there anything
October 24th, 1994House debate
Ron MacDonaldLiberal
Immigration Mr. Speaker, the family sponsorship breakdown is of concern. Certainly the consultation process has said that very loud and clear. Currently roughly 14 per cent of family class sponsorships do break down at an estimated cost of roughly $700 million to the federal and provincial
October 24th, 1994House debate
Sergio MarchiLiberal
Federal Intelligence Agencies of thing or in what happened under previous governments, including those under which he served. Can the Deputy Prime Minister tell us what important piece of news her government has learned lately, which prompted it to give clear instructions putting an end to spying on citizens
October 24th, 1994House debate
Federal Intelligence Agencies not have the right to engage in spying. Is that clear?
October 24th, 1994House debate
Sheila CoppsLiberal
Social Security Programs the Canadian taxpayer one cent nor will it add one job to the economy. At least in the case of UI the paper gives two fairly clear options. However they are once again without any type of cost benefit analysis. How much more money would it cost? We do not know the answer to this question
October 24th, 1994House debate
Ray SpeakerReform
Social Security Programs Mr. Speaker, to my colleague across the way let me make it clear I believe that benefits should be based on need. The fact remains that we as a government can assess policy options through the review we are having with Canadians once the consultation process is over. I believe
October 24th, 1994House debate
Bob NaultLiberal
Social Security Programs the debt. I wish to inform him that to begin with some of the debt was caused by the Liberal government. Then we had the new regime, the Tories, and a small debt grew into a huge debt. The member for Frontenac says that we are on the verge of bankruptcy. I wish to be very clear
October 24th, 1994House debate
Brenda ChamberlainLiberal