Natural Resources committee   think representatives from the regions I represent would be more than willing to correct the record in terms of the Ring of Fire. It's not Bill C-69 holding it up. It was a decision by Doug Ford to exclude the Eabametoong and Neskantaga first nations that caused the trouble, which

Building Homes Not Bureaucracy Act   a different view. We believe in investing in people. We believe in putting people before profits. We are saying that we should keep the private sector's hands off public lands. Doug Ford promised to deliver housing. He made backroom deals to carve up the Greenbelt, to make his developer

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, people in Ontario did not pay a carbon tax. We were part of the cap and trade system, but then Doug Ford and his gang of grifters came in from Etobicoke. They ran on a buck a beer. They said they were going to get people a buck a beer, but decided to rip up all

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, my hon. colleague knows the importance of fighting climate change, because wildfires tore through his riding this summer. I agree that when Doug Ford decided to cancel the cap and trade, which created billions in revenues for the Province of Ontario to fund

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act  , selling off 6,000 government buildings and the divesting of 15% of public lands. What would that look like? We just saw what happened in Ontario with the Conservatives under Doug Ford. It looks like profiteering, profits for developers. In fact, a handful of developers would have made

The Environment   governance to provide assistance and additional tools to the minister. As many members in this place will know, since I asked that question in May, Premier Doug Ford of the province of Ontario has admitted he made a mistake. That is putting it mildly, but the point of my question remains

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act  Madam Speaker, I have heard Conservatives talk about selling 6,000 buildings and 15% of public lands. We only need to look at Ontario, where the Doug Ford Conservatives did a deal for the greenbelt; they sold public lands and put $8.3 billion into the pockets of developers

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act   buildings. As New Democrats, we would see benefits in leasing those lands and working with the developers and non-market housing groups to develop housing. My question to the member is this: Is the Conservatives' model more like a Queen's Park, Ontario Conservative, Doug Ford greenbelt

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act   about the Greenbelt scandal in Ontario. What are the federal Conservatives going to do differently than the Doug Ford Conservatives to ensure we do not have another Greenbelt scandal? They talk about selling off public lands and public buildings. What are they going to do to ensure

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act   housing. Sadly, we had a Liberal government that stopped that. In Ontario, we had a Conservative government that stopped that in the 90s. We need to get back to that level of investment and commitment. We cannot continue to see current governments, such as Doug Ford's provincial

Justice committee   province, the province of Ontario. Doug Ford's government and Doug Downey, as the AG, have been very complimentary in terms of what we've been doing and very supportive in terms of what we've been doing. What I found unique about the situation is that we had the support behind

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act  , which allowed young people and working-class people to be forced out of the cities they love. In my region, the housing and homelessness issue is at a crisis level. We never saw Doug Ford offer to build any houses in Timmins. He was willing to sell off the greenbelt, but we could use

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act  Madam Speaker, I am very fascinated when I hear Conservatives talk about affordability. I think of Doug Ford, Mr. X, the $8-billion scheme and the trip they took down to Vegas. They do not remember it, but they were all at the spa at the same time. I would like to ask my hon

Business of Supply   the policies of the day were to make areas more intense and dense. Doug Ford looked to completely eliminate that, but we all see how that worked out for him. He had to reverse his position on that, probably exposing the Ontario people to huge liability in terms of court cases. The reality

Business of Supply  , as this idea was conceived and brought into North America back in around 2005, 2006, and that was with the western initiative. This was a number of states. This was Quebec, which still, to its benefit, and rightfully so, is in the western alliance, and Ontario, at the time, although Doug