Indigenous and Northern Affairs committee  Just very briefly, I would love to hear your personal story of how you've come to this important view of having such great values and ensuring that more people work with first nations, Métis and Inuit, because it's not very often that we hear regular Canadians talking about

Procedure and House Affairs committee   that this was an unprecedented national security crisis for which our institutions were not fully prepared. Despite this, Canada's national security agencies, police services, public institutions, elected officials, civic leaders and regular Canadians worked together to successfully end this highly volatile

Preserving Provincial Representation in the House of Commons Act   would be able to achieve more for Canadians. The neglect of regular Canadians that we have seen over decades, while hundreds of billions have been given in handouts to banks and billionaires in overseas tax havens, would have to cease, because ultimately the NDP would have a greater

Budget Implementation Act, 2022, No. 1   of living? This morning, my husband filled up for $1.99 in the city of St. Thomas. Last year at this time, we know it was closer to two-thirds of that cost. I am asking the government to do some work, to start thinking about what it is like to be a regular Canadian who has to pay

Economic and Fiscal Update Implementation Act, 2021   sector. We have seen the Conservatives time and time again vote for actions in the House that will benefit the corporate sector at the expense of regular Canadians. I am wondering whether the member would support an excess profit tax on a number of different industries to make sure

Public Accounts committee   to make sure that the taxpayer and regular Canadians understand how this process works and where this money is going. I want to address paragraphs 14.49 and 14.50, which I believe contain probably the most problematic and largest issues facing this program. I'll read one out: “In our

Economic and Fiscal Update Implementation Act, 2021   day from constituents, regular Canadians, who are struggling to get by. We have called for relief from this carbon tax. We are talking about how the carbon tax is affecting the farmers we are dealing with in my area, and others who are trying to figure out how they are going

Economic and Fiscal Update Implementation Act, 2021   for an IPA flavour ahead of the needs of regular Canadians.

Emergencies Act   province of Saskatchewan, along with many legal experts, civil liberties associations and millions of regular Canadians across the country saying that while the situation in Ottawa has been very difficult for many people, and I have a great amount of compassion for them, it did not meet

Emergencies Act  Madam Speaker, I am not talking about all the people who have been involved, but all movements, as we know, have leaders. I heard members of the official opposition minimize what is currently going on, calling it peaceful and reflective of regular Canadians. I would ask my

Emergencies Act  , particularly on the Conservative side, have said that this is a peaceful protest, that these are just regular Canadians getting together and demonstrating because they disagree with the government. I fully support the right to protest in this country and the right for dissent

COVID-19 Protests  Mr. Speaker, on the question of caucus support for these blockades, the Conservative politicians need to make a choice. Are they for the blockades or are they for communities, our economy and regular Canadians? The member for Provencher pointed out that with the illegal

COVID-19 Protests  , versus what we are seeing here with illegal blockades that are hurting regular Canadians. They even talked about the potential overthrow of a duly elected government. That is not what is responsible for the Conservative—

Economic and Fiscal Update Implementation Act, 2021  . When we have a situation where half of Canada is excluded from any share of the wealth of the country, where $25 billion a year in taxpayer money is sent to overseas tax havens, where the banking sector and pharmaceutical lobbyists are a higher priority than regular Canadians, where

The Economy   regular Canadians. Certainly somebody with a $270,000-a-year salary should not be trying to equivocate with somebody who cannot buy a $60 bag of groceries. Will the minister apologize for trying to make that comparison?