Public Accounts committee  Ms. Yip, because that fundamentally changes the nature of the motion, I'm going to rule that out of order. You're welcome, of course, to vote against it, which is effectively what your amendment is doing.

Natural Resources committee  We're going to vote against this on principle. Again, on behalf of the Conservatives, clearly this bill has been rushed. Clearly the Liberals will pass a bill that will be uncertain, unclear and open to litigation, and I would suggest the concern with this word

Natural Resources committee   and cannot do with their natural resources. As we all know around the table, natural resource development is the sole jurisdiction of the provinces, so let's let the provinces do what they do best. We will be voting against this amendment.

ArriveCAN App   to show up at committee. Emails have been deleted, and now the RCMP is investigating. Yesterday, the Liberals continued their cover-up corruption by voting against our common-sense motion to release all documents related to the arrive scam app. What are they hiding? Only common

Employment Insurance Act   members of Parliament voting against the bill at second reading. Following the committee’s consideration of this bill, the Liberal government challenged amendments that sought to remove any ambiguity around parental benefits for indigenous peoples. The opposition to this from

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, one time in the not-too-distant past, we put forward a motion in the House to have the Auditor General study the ArriveCAN fiasco. With respect, the member voted against having the Auditor General do that work. I wonder if the member now regrets taking

International Trade committee  Madam Chair, I'll put my figures up against that gentleman's any time. When I vote against their budget allocations, I'm voting for my constituents, to remove this government from office because of their ineptitude. They have destroyed the Canadian economy. They have—

International Trade committee   members, in the NDP and Bloc, as well as the Liberals, voted against that. Canadians deserve answers. People of Niagara deserves answers. This government's obstinance in removing the application until the fall of 2022 denied tourism recovery to those in my community and throughout

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, the plank is in the eye of the person who just asked me if I could see the plank in mine. We did indeed vote against that, but it was a vote of non-confidence in this government because even then we already had doubts about its ability to manage public money

International Trade committee  , everyone except the Liberal-NDP government, but it should know there is still time to save the 2022 tourism season if it acts quickly, and it should start by supporting today's common sense and timely motion. Sadly, Madam Chair, the opposition parties voted against this motion

Royal Canadian Mounted Police  Mr. Speaker, what is clear to us is that, in November 2022, the government voted against the proposal to ask the Auditor General to conduct an investigation. The Liberals were not the ones who helped discover what had happened with ArriveCAN. At the time, some 10,000 people were

Royal Canadian Mounted Police  Mr. Speaker, if the minister and his colleagues thought that the Auditor General's work was so important, they would not have voted against the audit the Leader of the Opposition and common-sense Conservatives voted for. That was how we found out about this $60-million scandal

Business of Supply   in, in contracts. The same two guys admitted under questioning at committee that they fraudulently won the bids. That was not enough for the government to freeze the awarding of contracts to GC Strategies, just like every single one of the Liberal members voted against having Canada's Auditor

Business of Supply   to make his constituents on Vancouver Island spend $1,400 per household on outside consultants. Conservatives voted against every single nickel of that outsourcing. We are the only party in the House that can say that. All three costly coalition parties voted for those things. We

Business of Supply  , we wondered what was happening. We had been told it would cost $80,000. Now the Prime Minister wanted another $24 million. It was bizarre. Naturally, we voted against it. However, the Bloc Québécois said no problem, it was just another $24 million, and they voted in favour. When