Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act   government voted against a common-sense piece of legislation, Bill C-208, that would have aided in the transfer of farms from one generation of a family to the next. It came up with a crazy idea to reduce the amount of fertilizer we use in this country by 30%, following Europe's lead

Canada Early Learning and Child Care Act   are in the bill thanks to the Conservative Party of Canada. Also, I would like to remind the House that all the Conservative senators—because there is a Conservative caucus in the Senate—voted in favour of Senator Cormier's amendment. How many Liberals or Liberal-appointed independents voted

Canada Early Learning and Child Care Act   to the Conservative Party of Canada. I was the one who introduced them. I had the support of the Bloc Québécois, but the NDP and the Liberals voted against some of the amendments we proposed. However, we were able to get some of them through. Unfortunately, some others were rejected, and we had

Criminal Code   of medically facilitated suicide for those with mental health challenges. Government members, in the main, voted against that bill, and now they are coming back to the House. They have not learned the error of their ways. They do not recognize that, fundamentally, the medical system

Government Business No. 34—Proceedings on Bill C-62  ; conscience protection for practitioners who oppose MAID; and any expansion of the availability of eligibility for MAID be well thought out, carefully considered and not rushed. For these reasons, I voted to send Bill C-7 to committee, but voted against it at third reading because

Government Business No. 34—Proceedings on Bill C-62  Madam Speaker, in terms of legislative timing, the government missed an opportunity to actually resolve this issue when it voted against the private member's bill from my colleague, the member for Abbotsford. Conservatives put forward a bill in the fall that would fix

Canadian Heritage committee   in the spring. I do not agree with incurring half a million dollars in expenses if we then do not make the trip. I would prefer that we not buy airline tickets in advance and then ask Canadians to pay for a trip that doesn't happen. So I am voting against this trip.

Government Business No. 34—Proceedings on Bill C-62  , the Prime Minister and almost every Liberal MP voted against it. As for my colleagues, who seem unconcerned about the expansion of MAID, let me try to persuade them otherwise. There is no reasonable way to establish a legal framework to identify which mental illnesses are incurable

Government Business No. 34—Proceedings on Bill C-62   by the Supreme Court and we had to act as fast as possible, and that was not exactly the picture-perfect time to do it. Based on the Quebec experience, we have to take our time to study an issue. The bill that has been adopted was not perfect. I voted against it because I saw many loopholes

Government Business No. 34—Proceedings on Bill C-62  , and he decided to serve elsewhere. I remember that Mr. Lametti said that he would vote against the bill because he found that it did not go far enough. The bill was passed, but other things happened, and today we find ourselves having a debate on mental health. I would remind members

National Council for Reconciliation Act   as the AFN, ITK and the MNC, yet when the bill was reported back to the House, the Liberal-NDP coalition chose to deliberately vote against the will of its members on committee and remove the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples from the bill. The Liberal-NDP coalition chose to ignore

Public Accounts committee   down your audit. They voted against your audit. They routinely shut down committees. Just last week they shut down the committee that you and I were involved in when it was revealed that the RCMP were investigating. All of a sudden they brought a motion to adjourn. Just last week

Public Accounts committee   want this audit to happen at all, which is why they voted against it in the House of Commons. You found that rules were broken when contracting vendors offered gifts, hospitality and invitations that were not properly reported. How many public servants received these kinds

Public Accounts committee   and the disrespect for taxpayers shown by the government. I would remind you that the Liberal members all voted against this investigation, which today is revealing disturbing facts. Ms. Hogan, my question is the same as the one my colleague asked: did Canadians get value for money in the case

Natural Resources committee  Minister, if this bill passes as it is, it will be unconstitutional because of the largely unconstitutional parts of it. That is a pretty obvious reason why one would vote against this bill. There would be continued uncertainty for investors and also for the provinces