Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee To begin, I would like to say that I have been working in the field of climate change since 1999. I was not there when Canada's targets were set, but we heard Louise Comeau's testimony regarding the analysis which was carried out in the 1990s. So not only do we have the analysis
November 28th, 2006Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee Mr. Godfrey, I think you may have taken liberties with some of the text in my presentation. I would disagree with some of your characterizations. We don't argue about the importance of climate change. We totally agree with the importance of climate change and the importance
November 28th, 2006Committee meeting
Nancy Hughes Anthony
Environment committee emissions being put into the atmosphere now are going to have a growing impact over the next 20 to 30 years, so what we're experiencing in climate change right now has been impacted by greenhouse gas emissions growing over the last 20 to 30 years. Would you not agree with that? Where
November 28th, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee --that there is much controversy surrounding the science around greenhouse gases, climate change effects, and human activities. It is on page 4. But then you urge us, in the spirit of despair, to get on with adaptation, because it's clear that no action will be enough to stop the effects of climate
November 28th, 2006Committee meeting
John GodfreyLiberal
Environment committee very good projects abroad which we could invest in and which would significantly affect climate change. There is the issue of cost, which is evaluated at a maximum of $20 billion over four or five years. It's a question of political will: is our future and that of our children
November 28th, 2006Committee meeting
Pablo RodriguezLiberal
Environment committee With all due respect to Mr. Godfrey, I don't think we can isolate mitigation from adaptation. The degree of adaptation that will be necessary will depend entirely on the extent to which we're able to slow the rate of climate change. So we can't consider one without the other
November 21st, 2006Committee meeting
Dr. David Sauchyn
Environment committee The reason I ask is that when we're looking at questions of, say, the development of the tar sands in northern Alberta, the proposal to use your industry to transport natural gas to that development to then produce tar sand oil is, in a climate change analysis, a rather terrible
November 21st, 2006Committee meeting
Environment committee on. That's being driven today primarily by changes in provincial policy. I want to address, as our other witnesses have today, our thoughts on addressing climate change in a comprehensive way and how we would be an example of domestic action. It is our perspective, in terms of Kyoto—I'm
November 21st, 2006Committee meeting
Kory Teneycke
Environment committee by production or for an activity, not only economic costs, but environmental costs as well. In the field of climate change, the guilty parties are rarely the first victims, which is an enormous problem as regards responsibility. That's why elements were put in place with regard
November 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Claude Villeneuve
Environment committee of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This is the United Nations' process, which John Stone talked about earlier, that is monitoring and evaluating the emerging climate research. The IPCC has been warning that in a warmer world there would be more weather extremes. For Canadians
November 7th, 2006Committee meeting
Paul Kovacs
Environment committee Thank you very much. I think there are effects of climate change that do affect children. For one thing, it's predicted that there will be an increase of rather unique or exotic illnesses that children can get because of the change in climate. We're going to have different
November 6th, 2006Committee meeting
Donald Spady
Environment committee I had two points, if I could be brief. On the climate change question, Mr. Glover mentioned the link between climate change and air pollution, but I'd like to re-emphasize that. What you do to control the emission of greenhouse gases is probably going to result in a concomitant
November 6th, 2006Committee meeting
Prof. Daniel Krewski
Environment committee Let me clarify. I don't mean climate change models; I mean more of a business case model. Where would the components likely come from? What would the implications be? The committee hasn't really looked at that yet. We understand and we're supportive of the 2012 targets. My
November 2nd, 2006Committee meeting
Environment committee , especially the problem of climate change, are being run out of other departments, and I guess for the most part it's Natural Resources Canada, if you think of EnerGuide and so on. Also, there was another program funding an environmental research network in Canada that I guess was also
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Francis ScarpaleggiaLiberal
Environment committee Thank you very much for this question. It's somewhat technical, but as you know, the previous government was in a position to assess all climate change programs. This review enabled us to determine to what extent the programs would go forward. The $34.5 million and the amounts
October 31st, 2006Committee meeting
Basia Ruta