Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee I'm familiar with our responsibility, but I'll ask my colleague, Monsieur Arseneault. My understanding is that the round table, when the draft climate change plan is submitted to Parliament, has 120 days to do an assessment, essentially of the work related to the estimates
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee To the best of my knowledge, no. I think this is a new requirement for the submission of an annual climate change plan.
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee To prove my point about not getting across the starting line, I'm going to ask about the Kyoto implementation act. To quote from your introduction on page 57, “The Act requires the Minister of the Environment to prepare and implement an annual climate change plan to address
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jeff WatsonConservative
Environment committee . It is to provide an analysis of Canada's progress in implementing the climate change plans. So we viewed our mandate as twofold: one was within the strict Kyoto targets, and second, the overall implementation of the plans that had been presented by the government. In terms of the reasonable
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee would point out as a point of information that the Kyoto Protocol was the outgrowth of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which was signed by the Conservative government in 1992. But I digress. I would like to speak a bit about your Fisheries and Oceans
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Francis ScarpaleggiaLiberal
Environment committee This would be the overestimate, based on the government's own estimates that they put forward for their climate change plans in 2007 and 2008.
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I want to thank the Commissioner for his report, which was unfortunately submitted while the committee was away on business in Alberta. It provides us with an update on the Canadian government's progress with respect to climate change policies
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Bernard BigrasBloc
Environment committee basin. If one were to take the broader view and look at the likely stresses on the basin in coming years, particularly in light of possible impacts of climate change, then one is inevitably struck, it seems to me, first, by the highly deferential role that the federal government has
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
J. Owen Saunders
Environment committee Yes, I need to catch up on the numbers, but as I understand it there are two critical drivers, and the dam is one of them. There's also the impact of climate change on that river as well, in fact, on the Peace-Athabasca Delta itself. It is a net loss of water from the Peace
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Tony Maas
Environment committee by climate change. We recognize that without a robust global and national response to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including substantial performance improvements in the energy sector, all bets are off. Although we will focus in this presentation on the management of terrestrial
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Ken Chapman
Environment committee , and it is global emissions that are relevant for climate change purposes.
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Don Thompson
Environment committee of reductions in river water. However, the oil sands contribute to greenhouse gases, which directly cause climate change. Furthermore, Alberta, because of the oil sands, produces 43% of the greenhouse gases emitted by Canada as a whole. Those greenhouse gases have a direct impact
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Environment committee River were to decrease because of climate change or for other reasons, the effect would be that the water management framework would be implemented more often, and that would restrict the oil sands withdrawals more often in order to ensure protection of the river. In addition
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Stuart Lunn
Environment committee that is trafficable. It's also a process that addresses U.S. regulations directly and completely. Reduced carbon intensity overall is in accordance with the low-carbon fuel supply act, greenhouse gas emissions are eliminated from tailing ponds in accordance with the climate change act, and waste
May 12th, 2009Committee meeting
Thomas Gradek
Environment committee tied in with climate change, tied in with resource development. The water crosses all jurisdictions. It doesn't stop because there's a political line there. At the very least, environment ministers are now talking about the need to look at how we coordinate our efforts. We've done
May 12th, 2009Committee meeting
J. Michael Miltenberger