Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee Thank you. I wanted to begin with the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act. Beginning in 2007 and ending in 2013, the act stipulates that the government in power produce an annual climate change report. Has the government met that requirement?
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee I was at a talk this morning with the U.K. presenting part of what their initiative is. One of the things they've done is they've required, under their legislation, that any climate change initiative must have a report to Parliament with a five-year backcast, what's happened so
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Environment committee So aside from the economic costs to business that were outlined in the Stern report and others if climate change is not acted upon—there are costs to not doing things—the market has since doubled, in 2007, up to $68 billion. If Canada doesn't have a verifiable way of measuring
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Environment committee to the Kyoto Protocol. Mr. Commissioner, I want to go back to energy prices. Just before doing that, I want to remind Canadians that it was the Progressive Conservative government of Brian Mulroney that, from 1988 to 1992, negotiated the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
David McGuintyLiberal
Environment committee I'm familiar with our responsibility, but I'll ask my colleague, Monsieur Arseneault. My understanding is that the round table, when the draft climate change plan is submitted to Parliament, has 120 days to do an assessment, essentially of the work related to the estimates
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee To the best of my knowledge, no. I think this is a new requirement for the submission of an annual climate change plan.
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee To prove my point about not getting across the starting line, I'm going to ask about the Kyoto implementation act. To quote from your introduction on page 57, “The Act requires the Minister of the Environment to prepare and implement an annual climate change plan to address
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Jeff WatsonConservative
Environment committee . It is to provide an analysis of Canada's progress in implementing the climate change plans. So we viewed our mandate as twofold: one was within the strict Kyoto targets, and second, the overall implementation of the plans that had been presented by the government. In terms of the reasonable
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee would point out as a point of information that the Kyoto Protocol was the outgrowth of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which was signed by the Conservative government in 1992. But I digress. I would like to speak a bit about your Fisheries and Oceans
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Francis ScarpaleggiaLiberal
Environment committee This would be the overestimate, based on the government's own estimates that they put forward for their climate change plans in 2007 and 2008.
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Scott Vaughan
Environment committee Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I want to thank the Commissioner for his report, which was unfortunately submitted while the committee was away on business in Alberta. It provides us with an update on the Canadian government's progress with respect to climate change policies
May 26th, 2009Committee meeting
Bernard BigrasBloc
Environment committee basin. If one were to take the broader view and look at the likely stresses on the basin in coming years, particularly in light of possible impacts of climate change, then one is inevitably struck, it seems to me, first, by the highly deferential role that the federal government has
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
J. Owen Saunders
Environment committee Yes, I need to catch up on the numbers, but as I understand it there are two critical drivers, and the dam is one of them. There's also the impact of climate change on that river as well, in fact, on the Peace-Athabasca Delta itself. It is a net loss of water from the Peace
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Tony Maas
Environment committee by climate change. We recognize that without a robust global and national response to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including substantial performance improvements in the energy sector, all bets are off. Although we will focus in this presentation on the management of terrestrial
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Ken Chapman
Environment committee , and it is global emissions that are relevant for climate change purposes.
May 13th, 2009Committee meeting
Don Thompson