Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 3076-3090 of 3514
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee   gas emissions, not just 30%. So this has some problems with the wording. I'm unclear as to the focus of the amendment that Mr. Bigras has proposed. However, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change does not itself include any specific targets, which has been

March 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Mark WarawaConservative

Environment committee   to the climate change crisis in different timelines. Our own minister, your minister, went to Bali to launch the two-year negotiation round as contemplated perfectly in the Kyoto Protocol to bring annex 2 countries like India and China and others inside the tent, so that by 2012 they would

March 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

David McGuintyLiberal

Environment committee  I move that Bill C-377, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 3 with the following: reduced, subject to the targets identified in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, It is important for our targets to be in line with those

March 3rd, 2008Committee meeting

Bernard BigrasBloc

Environment committee  Perhaps you could keep on the climate change issue. I don't find a lot of relevance in the War Measures Act in this one.

February 27th, 2008Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Environment committee   know that humanity will not be able to face climate change other than by adaptation if the major economies do not participate in limitations of emissions. We know that. So you start from there. How do we get there? I think the Bali process is indeed important, but at the same time

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Pierre Marc Johnson

Environment committee  I'd appreciate it if you'd let me answer. That was on process. Secondly, on substance, for instance, Bali is considered a fairly positive contribution to the climate change process in the international community. Why? Because a major decision had to be taken on whether we go

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Pierre Marc Johnson

Environment committee  Mr. Morton, I'm just going to interrupt you there for a second. It's Nathan Cullen, and I'm just taking over for my colleague, Mr. Stoffer, for a moment. I welcome you both. As well, I apologize, as I had my flights cancelled in northern British Columbia. It's all this climate

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Environment committee  I guess that's pretty much at the heart of the issue: either we think climate change is important, or it isn't. I happen to believe it is. It's also my perception that the minister believes it is. He has stated and reiterated in front of us, and I believe publicly, that he

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Pierre Marc Johnson

Environment committee   of Ontario and the climate change action plan process that was set up in the late 1990s. But it was a few years ago that I was involved in those processes.

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Ian Morton

Environment committee   to the final negotiation, which, of course, as you know, went overtime in order to be done. My problem is the perception—and I certainly won't ask you about what you personally spoke of with Mr. Baird on these issues—that the government is not fully convinced that climate change

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Peter StofferNDP

Environment committee  Well, I think many of our negotiators who work with the international climate change bureau at Environment Canada have been involved with the negotiations since the beginning and have both the historical knowledge and expertise to provide counsel to the government with regard

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Ian Morton

Environment committee   of respect for the report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change?

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Bernard BigrasBloc

Environment committee   on 1990, which was the year used in the Kyoto Protocol, and on the other you had countries like Canada that not only included 2006 as the reference year in its climate change plan but that also persuaded the other countries to adopt that position. When an individual has worked hard

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Bernard BigrasBloc

Environment committee   observer believes can achieve even a 20% cut by 2020 by using intensity targets and 2006 as the baseline year? As two experts who have been around this climate change process for a long time, can you help us to understand this? Were you able to reconcile the government's domestic plan

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

David McGuintyLiberal

Environment committee  Thank you. Good afternoon. As a bit of context, I run a small business here in Toronto. We provide services to a utility sector here in Canada and in the United States. We work with Manitoba Hydro and B.C. Hydro. We have 30 utilities in Ontario and in the United States developin

February 25th, 2008Committee meeting

Ian Morton