Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee to know is that even though Treasury Board now is working on this framework--and you will remember that Treasury Board came here and talked about the RMAF, the framework for the pilot on climate change, to develop this framework on horizontal issues. The reality is still that even
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas
Environment committee There was some economic analysis, but it was not detailed. We couldn't find any social, environmental, and risk analysis linked to this. Climate change is not only about the environment, it's also about sustainable development; it's about our way of living, because it's linked
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Richard Arseneault
Environment committee question to start out. In your chapter 5, I believe it is, on environmental petitions, you said that “Since 2001, climate change and air quality issues have been referenced increasingly in environmental petitions received by the Auditor General of Canada.” So those are the issues
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee My colleague was saying earlier that we will revisit the smog issue for next year's report. We have looked here and there at some air quality issues, but not as we did for climate change, with one focus and covering the broader aspects of it. But as Richard is involved
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas
Environment committee I appreciate that. Could we pass on, then, to the climate change issue? I just wanted a general answer. But that is coming.
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee and accountability are fundamental in all policy areas and are especially crucial elements of complex, horizontal, long-term files like climate change. You then have bullet points: establishing clear roles, responsibilities, and authority for all federal departments and agencies
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Mark WarawaConservative
Environment committee at seriously, I will probably be here again five years from now and have an almost cut-and-paste copy of this section. I also would like to remind you that in 1998 we looked at climate change and almost said the same thing. So things have not evolved that much in terms of good governance
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas
Environment committee Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Commissioner, I thank you and your team for coming. The Prime Minister recently said, shortly before your report was published, that climate change should be taken with a grain of salt. He added that if we are unable to predict the temperatures
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Pablo RodriguezLiberal
Environment committee I will give you a very quick answer. If I may, I will then ask my colleagues to tell you what we based our comments on. We take for granted that the government has recognized the scientific analyses conducted, namely by the United Nations' committee on climate change, as well
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas
Environment committee Thank you. We hear a lot of talk about smog, air quality and climate change. They are all important considerations. In specific terms, how important is the effort to counter climate change? Do you think the government should consider this a priority?
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Pablo RodriguezLiberal
Environment committee I repeat, it is not my job to set the government's priorities. I understand that climate change is a priority for the federal government. I have reported on the progress made so far.
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas
Environment committee Are you not concerned about the fact that climate change is not one of the government's five priorities?
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Pablo RodriguezLiberal
Environment committee I think the results achieved so far are disturbing. If climate change remains a priority for Canada, it is disturbing that we do not have a much more aggressive and rigorous approach in order to move from slowing down emissions to actually reducing green house gas emissions
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas
Environment committee The government often talks about the costs, sometimes astronomical, for setting up an effective climate change program. It always comes back to the issue of money, to the fact that this is expensive. In your opinion and that of the members of your team, is there not also a huge
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Pablo RodriguezLiberal
Environment committee We often talk about the cost of inaction. It is true that inaction does involve a cost. However, in the course of our work, we saw no studies that provided any information on the cost of adaptation and the consequences of climate change, for example. This information
October 3rd, 2006Committee meeting
Johanne Gélinas