Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Carbon Pricing more money in the pockets of nine out of 10 Canadian families, and we have a tax cut for the middle class that raised taxes on the wealthiest 1%. Now, by putting a price on pollution, we are making life even more affordable for Canadians and more expensive for polluters. I can
September 20th, 2018House debate
Sean Fraser
Global Warming , or the Conservative leader at that time, ruffled some feathers in his own party by putting forward in his election platform that he would have a price on pollution. He decided to put that in his platform because he thought it was good government policy. As I had already been elected to the House
October 15th, 2018House debate
Robert-Falcon OuelletteLiberal
Global Warming to all the provinces to come up with their own plans for putting a price on pollution. Some provinces stepped up and showed leadership. The provinces that have, or had, a price on pollution, which were B.C., Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, until, unfortunately, recently under the new
October 15th, 2018House debate
Catherine McKennaLiberal
Global Warming that a Nobel Prize winner in economics, William Nordhaus, won it for his support of carbon pricing, of putting a price on pollution. We have the Conservative opposition, not to a person because there is some leadership on this side but almost to a person, saying the carbon tax is a tax grab
October 15th, 2018House debate
Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal
The Environment the question as succinctly as I can, there is going to be a net benefit for Canadians with the plan to put a price on pollution, not a detriment. My colleague does not even need to take my word for it. He can ask Stephen Harper's former director of policy, who indicated
October 4th, 2018House debate
Sean Fraser
Global Warming . That is exactly what this government is doing after a decade of Stephen Harper's failure to see the country in that fashion, with the Conservatives not being able to embrace the fact that climate change was real and the way to fight it was putting a price on pollution. We also did not see
October 15th, 2018House debate
Kent HehrLiberal
Environment committee That's a great question. Why does a price on pollution necessarily get us to that pathway of 1.5 degrees by 2050? One thing that I'm unclear about in this overall discussion is what the government is proposing today. I heard you say carbon tax several times. That's not what I
October 18th, 2018Committee meeting
Hari Balasubramanian
Business of Supply was never serious about climate change. The Harper government announced targets with no intention of meeting them. Today we have the Leader of the Opposition saying that he is against the price on pollution. However, he is once again committed to meeting the Paris Agreement targets. We
May 1st, 2018House debate
Catherine McKennaLiberal
The Environment that will move both forward. This is what Canadians asked in 2015 when they elected our government, and it is the plan we are implementing. We know that putting a price on pollution is widely recognized as the most efficient and transparent way of reducing greenhouse gas pollution. It also
October 1st, 2018House debate
Sean Fraser
Taxation Mr. Speaker, that is simply not true. We are moving forward with putting a price on pollution, taking real action on fighting climate change, something the Conservatives were unwilling and unable to do for 10 years while in government, and evidently, continue to be unwilling
October 24th, 2018House debate
Justin TrudeauLiberal
The Environment Mr. Speaker, what the Prime Minister said today in Toronto is that our government made a commitment to Canadians in 2015 that we would have a robust plan to tackle climate change. We have said from the beginning that putting a price on pollution is one of the most effective
October 23rd, 2018House debate
Dominic LeBlanc
Environment committee price on carbon around the world, you're going to have market failures in certain aspects. By taking a leadership position and having a price on pollution in Canada, we need to encourage that group of 45 national jurisdictions that already have a price on pollution to turn
October 18th, 2018Committee meeting
Hari Balasubramanian
Environment committee It's so difficult being the first one with this panel because I have so many different directions I'd like to take this in. The first one points to what Mr. Balasubramanian talked about, that the price on pollution really can be an economic driver for many countries. We saw
October 18th, 2018Committee meeting
Mike BossioLiberal
Environment committee I'm sure you've seen this graph that came out recently from Australia and the impact this had. Its carbon emissions were increasing on a plane like this, and when it put a price on pollution, its emissions dropped off precipitously over that two-year period. As soon
October 16th, 2018Committee meeting
Mike BossioLiberal
Environment committee Thank you both so much for being here at our meeting. What you had to say really does hit home. Too many times we point out that the price on pollution is going to cause such hardship for so many taxpayers in our society, but as you stated, our taxpayers are already paying
October 16th, 2018Committee meeting
Mike BossioLiberal