Point Of Order  Mr. Speaker, I very briefly want to mention that I made an error on page 11771 in Hansard in debate when the member for Broadview-Greenwood was up speaking and the member for Saint-Léonard came in. I did not hear that he was calling time allocation on Bill C-76. I said

Income Tax Act   specifically how he felt a few moments ago when someone from his caucus walked into this Chamber in the middle of his speech and said that time allocation was going to be brought in on this piece of legislation. The hon. member and I sat together on this side of the House in the last

Income Tax Act   that the administration of this House because of the legislative agenda and because we do not sit as much requires this from time to time. We have brought in time allocation or closure on bills about 10 per cent compared to the previous government. I think you will find, Mr. Speaker, that any time we

Budget Implementation Act, 1995   Order 78(3), I give notice that I will be moving a time allocation motion at the next sitting of the House for the purpose of allotting a specific number of days or hours for further consideration of the bill at this stage and every question necessary in order to dispose

Firearms Act   the country. I know if she gets to speak later this afternoon, she will want to dissociate herself from those comments. With respect to the bill, first I would like to deal with the allegations made by the hon. member for Medicine Hat about the use of time allocation in the debate

Firearms Act   where the government tries to sell the good with the bad. Again, that is very cynical and very political and we absolutely disagree with that. The final straw is time allocation right before a break. In this place, of all places, we should be talking about very important issues

Electoral Boundaries Readjustment Act, 1995  The time allocated to the hon. member has expired.

Business Of The House   of Parliament. The first one, on Wednesday, March 22, 1995, was a time allocation motion limiting to one hour the debate at second reading. For those who are listening to us, the debate at second reading consists in examining the principle underlying the bill. When we are preparing

Maintenance Of Railway Operations Act, 1995  Or the workers. On Wednesday we had the bill for second reading. We asked for consent to put it through all stages. That was refused. Therefore we used time allocation and got the bill through second reading. We used time allocation again to get it through the committee

Maintenance Of Railway Operations Act, 1995   the government to the extent that it has supported the legislation and has agreed to time allocation in respect of various stages of the bill in order to expedite passage. I appreciate that support very much and acknowledge it. On the other hand, the hon. member for Lethbridge in his speech

Maintenance Of Railway Operations Act, 1995   labour relations. I speak here as a member of the Standing Committee on Human Resources Development which examined this bill clause by clause on Wednesday, under a gag order. This is the first time in the history of this Parliament that a government imposed time allocation

Borrowing Authority Act, 1995-96  No, I will take all the time allocated to me. You will learn something. People can learn something at any age, even on the other side of the House. The government talks about decentralizing but and the only thing they have decentralized is the deficit. They have shipped it out

Canadian Volunteer Service Medal For United Nations Peacekeeping Act   before the House. We share with him a strong desire to give fitting recognition to Canadians who serve in these vital and often dangerous operations. However, I regretfully cannot support this initiative and I want to use the time allocated to me today to explain my position to my

Young Offenders Act   to the maximums on the times allocated to them under the old provisions. We have to talk about who needs to know when the youth gets in trouble. That also was a concern of the public. It wants to be aware of who is offending and why this is happening in its communities. Again, we have taken

Budgetary Policy   than December 7, 1994. The committee was supposed to table this report on December 2. The motion under consideration asks us to authorize the committee to postpone this report until a later date. This will reduce the time allocated for consideration of this report. It is an old