National Strategy on Brain Injuries Act  Madam Speaker, I have not yet had the time to consult widely with the provinces, but I do not see Bill C-277 as in any way interrupting their clear jurisdiction over health policy. This really would be putting in a legislative requirement for our federal Minister of Health

National Strategy on Brain Injuries Act  moved that Bill C-277, an act to establish a national strategy on brain injuries, be read the second time and referred to a committee. Madam Speaker, it is indeed a great and rare honour to be able to stand in the House of Commons to sponsor and present a piece of legislation

Bill C-277 An Act to establish a national strategy on brain injuries

; (c) promote research and improve data collection on the incidence and treatment of brain injuries and on the rehabilitation and recovery of persons living with a brain injury; (d) promote information and knowledge sharing with respect to brain injury prevention, diagnosis

Questions Passed as Orders for Returns  ) dollar amount, (iii) company; (b) how much federal subsidies were provided to those major grocery companies (Loblaws, Metro, Walmart, Sobeys, and Costco) to support business development, by (i) year, (ii) dollar amount, (iii) company; and (c) what programs were responsible

Public Safety committee  Thank you, Chair. It's technical amendments to the wording. The first part—“that in the opinion of the committee”—I think is valid. Honestly, I didn't want us to take that long, but I think, to Mr. Lloyd's point, that's a regular standing order, so I think it is up to 45

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, related to today's discussion is Bill C-234. Conservatives have been campaigning loudly about how they would like to see the Senate amendments to that bill rejected and it be passed in its original form. I can say now, as I have said before, that the NDP supports

Agriculture committee  Thanks, Chair. I would like to reserve the right to put some amendments into the preamble. My position and the position of the NDP is quite clear, and I want to make sure that it's on the record that we do support Bill C-234 in its original form. We will be voting to reject

Agriculture committee  Thank you very much, Chair. I'd like to thank all of the witnesses for helping to guide this committee through our study of Bill C-355. Captain Perry, I'd like to start with you. I appreciate how clear you are with the amendments. You specifically mentioned the sections

Questions on the Order Paper   investigations concluded that consumers were being harmed; and (c) what are the details of all investigations into practices that hurt consumers that have been initiated by the Task Force in (a), including, the (i) name of the grocer being investigated, (ii) conduct being investigated, (iii

Questions Passed as Orders for Returns  ) purpose of the engagement, (iii) partner, expert, or representative being engaged; (c) what work has been done with consumer groups to report findings to Canadians, including the (i) date that work was initiated, (ii) consumer group with which work was done, (iii) details

Agriculture committee   have two bills. We have Bill C-355, which is before this committee right now, but we also have a bill from Senator Dalphond in the Senate. We have two different legislative approaches. We have private members' bills looking at this. In all of the time the department has had

Government Business No. 35—Extension of Sitting Hours and Conduct of Extended Proceedings  Madam Speaker, I am going to try to lower the temperature. I really want to put today's motion in the context of Bill C-50 because I think that bill in particular illustrates the reasoning behind the motion. When Bill C-50 was at committee, the Conservatives, I highly suspect

Agriculture committee  Well, Minister, I think there is also room for improvement. Let's take the Competition Bureau, the Competition Act and indeed the Competition Tribunal. A couple of weeks ago, there was an important vote in the House of Commons on NDP leader Jagmeet Singh's bill, Bill C‑352

Agriculture committee  I want to get to another question. I heard your opening comments about Bill C-234, and speaking for the NDP, I'll say we're supportive of the bill that was passed at third reading in the House of Commons. I understand the costs that you associated with that, but we also had

Health committee  Thank you. I'd like to turn to Minister Virani, if I could. You were mentioning, to paraphrase the Supreme Court, that they were going to give a high degree of deference to Parliament when legislating in this area because of how sensitive it was. When Bill C-7 was first