Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 286
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Anne Innis Dagg  Mr. Speaker, Dr. Anne Innis Dagg, the woman who loved giraffes, was a pioneering zoologist, groundbreaking biologist, animal rights activist, feminist and professor. She earned worldwide recognition for her studies of giraffes in the wild in 1956, wrote the bible of giraffes stil

April 10th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Right Hon. Brian Mulroney  Madam Chair, I rise on a point of order. In accordance with Standing Order 43(2)(a), I would ask that all periods of debate for Liberal members be divided in two.

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Pandemic Prevention and Preparedness Act  Madam Speaker, I appreciate my colleague's remarks and the amendment. It follows from the debate we had at second reading. I was clear at second reading when I said that the core of this bill is the plan. We need legislation passed in this House to ensure that all future governme

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, that is a great question because the answer is no. In fact, the Financial Times had an article the other day that said that insurance premiums are a hidden carbon price and that we are going to pay for climate action one way or the other. What I would put to my Cons

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, as I said in my remarks, 90% of the dollars go directly back to households. On the revenue neutrality, 100% of revenues go back to provinces of origin: 90% goes to households directly and the other 10% goes into businesses, municipalities and—

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, there is that other 10%, and there is a credible debate to be had as to whether that 10% should be allocated the way it has been allocated. I would argue that, if there were a vote in the House, and members are free to bring forward the motion, I would vote for 100%

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, in my last two budget submissions, I spoke to excess profit taxes. We have seen them on banks and insurance companies. We have seen them from U.K. Conservatives on oil and gas. It is absolutely a conversation we should have in the House. U.K. Conservatives were, I th

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, as I mentioned in my speech, there is a comprehensive climate plan. It touches on many different areas. The price on pollution is responsible for a huge number of emission reductions when we look at the plan up to 2030, and it is responsible for between 23% and 30% o

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I will get to the conversation around pricing pollution, but I want to start with a threshold question that we all have to answer: Do members care to take action to save our planet? Do they care to reduce emissions for our kids? Do they care? If the answer is yes, th

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I really appreciate the member's mentioning those people in desperate need and the need to help them. I co-chair the all-party anti-poverty caucus, and that has been a major focus of mine since 2015. We know by the numbers that the price on pollution has a very small

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, it is good to see the member. I appreciated his speech. He mentioned the PBO and asked why the PBO exists if it gets it wrong. Perhaps he could speak to the difference between fiscal and economic impacts. When I read the fiscal impacts, and that means cash transfers

March 19th, 2024House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1  Madam Speaker, I would dispute the idea that the government is not looking at non-market options. It was not in this budget, but in previous economic statements and budgets we certainly committed to an expansion of co-op housing, for example, one of the largest investments in co-

April 27th, 2023House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1  Madam Speaker, I thank the member for his work, especially his work in looking at housing options and partnerships with community organizations like legions. There is no question that provinces need to lead on this. I will speak to Ontario specifically. Its housing affordability

April 27th, 2023House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1  Madam Speaker, technology being what it is, I missed the preamble to the member's question. I only heard the last 15 seconds of it.

April 27th, 2023House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal

Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1  Madam Speaker, it was not, by the way, a matter of selecting the right channel. It was simply a matter of my home Internet. I am committed to supporting the budgets that the government puts forward. In this case, I do not support the idea of transfers that are not coordinated, t

April 27th, 2023House debate

Nathaniel Erskine-SmithLiberal