Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 1392
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Income Tax Act  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in debate on this bill today. What has been most interesting about the debate on this bill to date has been the opportunity to drill down into an issue of contemporary Canadian political semantics. There was a time when we started to talk about

March 7th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Income Tax Act  Mr. Speaker, it would be irresponsible to endorse a plan I have not seen. In the House we have been calling to see that plan. We keep being told that it is coming. However, until I see the details, I will not say one way or another whether it is something I would be willing to su

March 7th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Income Tax Act  Mr. Speaker, I would agree with the hon. member that I am concerned that as deficits mount for a Liberal government, it does look to cutting programs eventually as a way to make up for that shortfall. That is why we have proposed that it look at raising the corporate tax rate and

March 7th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Income Tax Act  Mr. Speaker, Canadians made it very clear in the last election that there is an appetite for government to invest in infrastructure, whether physical or social infrastructure. However, I wonder about the wisdom of cutting government revenue to make those investments. Canadians ar

March 7th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, the aerospace industry is obviously very important in Canada. It is not the kind of industry one can exit and then get back into later. Therefore, I think it is important that we show support for the aerospace industry. We cannot really consider the motion outside o

March 8th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I was surprised not to hear the member for Winnipeg North mention our home town of Winnipeg as he spoke about the aerospace industry. He did allude to some job losses, and it was the case that under the previous government, we lost hundreds of jobs in Winnipeg becau

March 8th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Questions Passed as Orders for Returns  With regard to changes to the machinery of government made on November 4, 2015: (a) for each department that was changed, what is the cost of making those changes (i) in total, (ii) broken down by category of expense; and (b) for each agency, Crown corporation, board, commission,

March 9th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in the House tonight to follow up a question I asked the government on the new environmental assessment process it is building. I know this topic has been the subject of a lot debate in the House. The debate can sometimes get quite polemical when

March 10th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, I think the parliamentary secretary and I can agree that the old process under the previous government was bad, and we agree on wanting to see a much better process. The one thing she said that was of particular concern to me is that projects that were initiated and

March 10th, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, there are a number of exclusions from collective bargaining within this bill. I was wondering if the parliamentary secretary could shed some light on what exactly is excluded from bargaining under this bill and what the reasons are for excluding them.

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, I heard the hon. parliamentary secretary say that part of what this bill is meant to do is address, in a minimal way, what the Supreme Court has asked be done with regard to the right of RCMP officers to bargain collectively. It does not pretend to do much else abo

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, it is a pleasure to rise in the House today to speak to Bill C-7 and contribute to the debate on the bill. I will start by echoing the thanks that other members have offered today to the men and women in the RCMP for their service to the country. What better way t

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, I certainly acknowledge that RCMP members are going to have more of a say around certain aspects of their employment by virtue of the bill. The thanks goes to the Supreme Court on that, not the new government. To the extent that the bill responds minimally to the S

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, I thank the member for the question because it cuts to the essence of what I am trying to get at. Collective bargaining can be an important tool to address persistent issues within an organization or workplace. When the government says it is looking at those issues

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP

Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act  Madam Speaker, to the extent that I believe that once Bill C-4 passes we will have a better certification regime in Canada, it is a happy coincidence that the two bills are moving in tandem through the House of Commons. That means that when RCMP members are ready to organize, if

March 22nd, 2016House debate

Daniel BlaikieNDP