Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 861
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, it is actually a question of privilege. Once again I find myself joining others who are rising to raise an issue of my rights being infringed. I rise, believe me, much more in sorrow than in anger, because the incident that happened occurred within less than an hou

May 11th, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, I am in my fifth Parliament, and I cannot tell you how many times we have already dealt with this issue at PROC. We hear every time that it will not happen again, and yet it does. We understand when there is an emergency security issue, particularly if we are dealin

May 2nd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, my friend covered a lot of ground. I take much of what he has talked about as underscoring the difficulty the government has between understanding the difference between the executive, cabinet, and government and the rest of us who constitute Parliament. Consistenl

April 13th, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Marijuana  The first step. You know it's just the first step.

April 10th, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Standing Orders of the House of Commons  Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the Prime Minister for taking so many questions today. I would also like to point out, again, that he managed to do this without changing a single rule. No need to unilaterally use the power to ram through the changes. He was able to do it withi

April 5th, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the government House leader why she moved away from the approach of her predecessor who, as I mentioned in my remarks earlier, on January 28 of last year came into the committee, mentioned that his mandate was to work with House leaders to make th

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I want to compliment my friend for the outstanding job he has done at PROC. He is not a member but has subbed in. He pushed close to six hours of continuous filibustering. As someone who has done that sort of thing, it is not easy. He did an excellent job. The hon.

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, again, the government is insistent that the opposition should just be reasonable and start talking. What it is failing to accept is that the process that it has followed has made that impossible. The proof of that is where we are right now. The member asked, in good

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I am thankful for the opportunity to join in the debate. I would like to start by coming back to the focus of what is actually on the floor, which is a report from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. It just happens that this report is on the famil

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my friend, the member for Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame for his remarks. He was doing pretty good there for a while, and then he got into a couple of rough bumps. I know time is tight on these questions and answers, but there are a couple of thing

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  They did not put a time on it.

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Committees of the House  It was not two months.

April 3rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Privilege  Mr. Speaker, as members know, we have dealt with this issue on a number of occasions, and the most recent was not that long ago. While I was not a party to the incident that is on the floor now, I had been involved in discussions at PROC and the issuance of those reports. I kno

March 23rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Rules of the House  Mr. Speaker, this goes well beyond an innocent discussion paper. The government House leader should not insult our intelligence by claiming otherwise. However, if she is serious about that, if she is really truly sincere that her motives are pure, will she now stand in her place

March 23rd, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP

Rouge National Urban Park Act  Madam Speaker, that is an excellent point, because it suggests that in the last Parliament, had the previous government wanted to get its bill through, it would have likely had to get support from one of the other parties, and the condition for that support might have been the ec

February 17th, 2017House debate

David ChristophersonNDP