Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the member across the way. I was a member of his committee once. He was a really good Chair of that committee, one of the best Chairs on the Liberal side of the House that I have had to work with. Let me say that when there are rulings from the Supreme

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Mr. Speaker, if I made a mistake, I apologize. I listened to his colleague's speech, which seemed to suggest that he was in favour of the bill. I was sure that he was in favour of the bill, because I know him well. I know that he does not like the oil and gas sector, especially i

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, it is my honour tonight to rise and speak to this filibuster that these people are claiming it is at this point in time. We have a number of motions that we have to address through committee processes—

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, I am speaking about the bill in front of us at this point in time. I apologize if my colleague does not know that. I have been speaking about this since it arose over a year ago—

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, I will start over, if I may. We are here tonight to debate exactly what we are trying to ram through the House of Commons, which is a bill the Liberals put on the table over a year ago. I have spoken to many groups in Calgary about what this legislation represents

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for those comments on this bill and why we are at the stage we are at today. We are here because the Conservatives on the committee are trying to make sure the government understands there is a whole bunch at play here. Number one is jobs. Numb

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. You asked him to withdraw the comment about the physical violence that he suggested my colleague visited upon him here in this House of Commons. I think everybody here in this House of Commons knows that did not occur. I would ask you t

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, on a point of order, this is the House of Commons. We do not talk about physical violence in the House of Commons. Nobody has here. The fact that the member has brought it up, and said that somebody is threatening him physically, when nothing of the—

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, I am asking you to make the member withdraw that remark because there was no threat of physical violence. It was for the member to try to make that statement outside of the House of Commons, where there is no parliamentary privilege accorded. This was from somebody

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, it is the second time I have heard in the House of Commons that there is something anti-Semitic being referred to on this side of the House. Nothing could be farther from the truth, and I ask the member to withdraw the comment.

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, this is about labour. The minister keeps saying it is about the labour that is going into Canadian manufacturing and the labour that he can try to move, with Canadian taxpayer dollars, out of productive industries and into unproductive industries that are not makin

Government Business No. 31—Proceedings on Bill C-50  Madam Speaker, this has been on the floor of the House of Commons and in front of committee, but there has been a moving target on this, particularly with the Supreme Court's reading on the Impact Assessment Act, which has reopened whether there is any validity to this law whatso

Automotive Industry  Madam Speaker, after a set of incompetent negotiations, the NDP-Liberal government acceded to a $15-billion subsidy to Stellantis. That is $6 million in taxpayer funds per job, but more than half these jobs may actually be coming from Korea. After eight years, the government is n

Canada Labour Code  Madam Speaker, I am rising in defence of my colleague as well, and I think there is a lot of evidence in the House of Commons that the Prime Minister has, we will say, misled the House. The member called somebody by a name that indicates they have misled, but he did not call any

Canada Labour Code  Madam Speaker, I will ask my colleague, after his impassioned speech, the same question I asked his colleague, for which I did not receive an adequate answer. How does he feel about this legislation being put forward in this House of Commons by the Liberal government after it vot