Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 537
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, I would love to join the member in his riding. Canada is a magnificent place and we should all get to each other's ridings whenever we can to understand and respect its diversity and beauty. Respecting that diversity is part of what these issues are all about, be

January 28th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Business of Supply  Madam Speaker, the member is the best example I could ever imagine of clarity and precision. I have one comment on the accusations of ideology and politicization of this process. I am sure I heard the hon. member for Beauce say that politicians should have the last say. Is that

January 28th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, yesterday Canadians were offered a brand new image, and that was the image of the Minister of Environment and the Minister of Natural Resources standing next to each other talking about sustainably developing the energy sector and the Canadian economy. Since then, ma

January 28th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Business of Supply  Mr. Speaker, I welcome my fellow Manitoban's contribution to the debate. I also respect the considerable experience he has in the sector and the way he has observed the energy sector grow in Canada over many years. However, when we were in New Brunswick and had to be a part of

January 28th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, every member of the House knows that there are Canadians who are suffering from job losses because of low commodity prices. They are suffering in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, and New Brunswick. We need to establish a credible process that will ha

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, I am glad that the hon. member brought up the matter of trust. It was a lack of trust in the regulatory process under the Conservatives' regime that resulted in no pipelines built to tidewater from 2011. We have consulted widely across the country, across sectors, an

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, there will be hope when Canadians are faced with a regulatory regime that has their confidence, and that will only be done if we meaningfully consult with indigenous communities, with industry, with environmental groups, and across regions of the country. With good p

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, there is no one in the House who speaks more clearly, more loudly, more passionately for the people of Saint John than the member does. We hear it all the time. There is no political party in the House that has a monopoly on compassion. I can assure the House and t

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we are determined to modernize the National Energy Board. We will be asking Canadians from coast to coast to offer constructive opinions about how that could best be done. Those Canadians include members opposite, who one would think would have more of an interest th

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, 20% of the national economy is dependent on natural resources. This is the way it has been in Canada for a very long time, and it will continue to be. It is the aim of this government, and I am sure every member of the House, to move our resources to market sustain

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, the delay under the former Conservative government was a permanent delay because there were no pipelines built between 2011 and October 19, 2015. The reason is because the process was not credible. These projects will not go forward unless it is credible. We are do

February 1st, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, it was legislative changes made by the other government that led to cabinet being asked to make important decisions on great national projects. A political decision is a decision for which politicians are held accountable. We will be held accountable after a process

February 16th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we announced several weeks ago a new process that will lead to a better regulatory process for Canada. We know from experience over the last five and six years that that process has not carried the support of Canadians. Therefore, no projects have actually come to fr

February 16th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we understand that low commodity prices have a consequence for families and for individuals in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Newfoundland and Labrador. When the government was in New Brunswick, it was able to feel the impact of a mine closure first-hand. We understand t

February 16th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, I am glad for the question, because as the member knows, we will be modernizing the National Energy Board. We will be looking for advice from all members of the House in taking the regulatory system in Canada and improving it. I look forward to having conversations

February 16th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal