Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 511-525 of 537
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we realize that a very strong natural resource sector is important to the future of the Canadian economy. We also have a mandate to make sure that those projects end up at tidewater and export markets. With the public confidence of Canadians through a robust environm

January 27th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

The Economy  Mr. Speaker, we know there are job losses across the country in the natural resource sector. We were in New Brunswick only last week where hundreds of jobs were lost in a potash mine because of commodity prices. We understand that Alberta is very keen to see natural resources mo

January 27th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

The Environment  Mr. Speaker, it would be interesting to compare the positions of the three parties opposite to what we are advocating, which is to consult Canadians about a process that will lead to these major projects that are important for the future of the Canadian economy, to carry the conf

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we have indicated that we understand the human consequence to job loss. We understand that the low commodity prices in the oil and gas sector and in potash have led to layoffs across the country, most recently in New Brunswick. We take that very seriously. We also u

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we have said that there will be a new process of transition for those projects that are currently under review by the National Energy Board. We have been saying that those principles and the transition period will be announced in a number of weeks. I can now say that

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, at the time the American decision was taken, the Prime Minister indicated that we regretted that decision from the government of the United States. We have also said that the decision to appeal it through a NAFTA panel is the business of the proponent and not of the

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, the confidence that really matters is the confidence of Canadians in the process that we are about to encourage. Rather than playing politics with pipelines, rather than trying to pit one region of the country against another, we will unite Canadians who will under

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, I spoke to Commissioner Gelfand yesterday about her report, and I spoke to the chair of the National Energy Board this morning about her recommendations. I am assured by the chair that there will be instant action. In fact, it started quite some time ago. It is the

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we will defend the economic interests of all Canadians, whether they live in Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick, Quebec, or Newfoundland. The building of major infrastructure projects is very important to the Canadian economy as we look at ways of moving our natur

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we are aware of how important the natural resource sector is in Canada to creating jobs. We also know that at the moment there are particular regions in the country that are hurting because of job losses because of commodity prices, particularly in Alberta and Saskat

January 26th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Questions on the Order Paper  Mr. Speaker, with regard to (a)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (v), (vi), and (vii), the Minister of Natural Resources’ mandate letter outlines the government’s intent to introduce a new environmental assessment process to restore public trust. As noted in the question, the objectives ar

January 25th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, major projects will proceed if Canadians feel that they have been heard and if Canadians feel as if the process enjoys their confidence. It is possible in Canada to look at environmental protection and economic development at the same time. That is the commitment of

January 25th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we are building the Canadian economy, and the Canadian economy will be built with large projects if they have the public confidence of Canadians. They have not had the public confidence of Canadians, which is why we are committed to modernizing the National Energy Bo

January 25th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we have said all along that there will be a transitional process that will govern those major projects that are currently under review. That process will embody the principles that will be necessary if we are going to get approval of these very important projects for

January 25th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal

Natural Resources  Mr. Speaker, we are aware of the importance of the resource economy to Canada. We know that 20% of our country's GDP is embedded in the natural resource sector. We are committed to developing this sector in a responsible way because we understand that tens of thousands of people

January 25th, 2016House debate

Jim CarrLiberal